Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign is facing an unusual challenge—enthusiastic supporters who can’t clearly define where she stands on major issues. As she continues to shift her positions on energy, healthcare, and immigration, Harris is leaving even her staunchest backers puzzled, but still loyal, as reported by the New York Post.
At 59, Harris has taken over the Democratic ticket from President Biden, but her strategy seems more about appeasing moderates in swing states than sticking to her original policies.
In 2019, as a California senator vying for the Democratic presidential nomination, she made bold promises: eliminating private health insurance, decriminalizing illegal border crossings, banning fracking, and phasing out new gas-powered cars by 2035. Today, those stances have largely been abandoned or softened in an apparent bid to broaden her appeal.
Shotgun Pistol – No FFL Required, Shipped Directly To Your Home
Despite this, many swing-state voters remain committed to Harris, though their reasons often boil down to her simply not being Donald Trump.
For instance, Aaliyah Dittman, a 20-year-old college student from Pennsylvania, sees Harris as more moderate on immigration. However, she admits that Harris needs to distinguish herself from the Biden administration if she wants to gain more clarity and credibility among voters.
Harris, who once supported decriminalizing illegal border crossings and opposed Trump’s wall, now talks about border security and hiring more Border Patrol agents, leaving her stance murky at best.
The same ambiguity applies to her environmental policies. Harris once championed a fracking ban and was an early supporter of the $2 trillion Green New Deal. However, she has since reversed her stance on fracking and has avoided talking about climate legislation altogether.
Voters like McKenna Anderson, a University of Michigan junior, and Anna Klein, a freshman at the same university, express doubt about Harris’ commitment to environmental issues, suspecting that Democrats are merely pandering when they discuss these topics.
Abortion remains a key issue for many of Harris’ supporters, yet even here, there’s uncertainty.
Harris is widely recognized as pro-choice, but her specific policies on reproductive rights are not well-known, even among her backers. For some, like Dittman, who prioritizes reproductive rights and gun safety, Harris’ vague promises are enough to secure their vote.
Others, like Brandyn Fragosa, a communications major from Virginia, are backing Harris based on a broad alignment with her beliefs, despite being unable to identify any standout policy positions.
Ultimately, for many Harris supporters, this election isn’t about policy. It’s about preventing Trump from returning to the White House.
Craig Wuest, a former Pentagon expert, sees Trump as the greatest threat to democracy he’s ever witnessed. Pastor Tanesha Jordan Roberts, a Republican from Las Vegas, echoes this sentiment, emphasizing that this election is about restoring sanity, not debating policies.
Read the full article here
