By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Concealed RepublicanConcealed Republican
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
Reading: Republican Senators Introduce Bill Deregulating Suppressors
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Concealed RepublicanConcealed Republican
  • News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Concealed Republican > Blog > News > Republican Senators Introduce Bill Deregulating Suppressors
News

Republican Senators Introduce Bill Deregulating Suppressors

Jim Taft
Last updated: February 1, 2025 6:21 pm
By Jim Taft 4 Min Read
Share
Republican Senators Introduce Bill Deregulating Suppressors
SHARE

In a lot of countries, owning guns isn’t exactly easy. However, they do make it pretty easy for those who do own them to also have suppressors for them. They’re viewed as safety devices, ways to not just reduce potential damage to the shooter’s hearing, but also to keep from disturbing those who live near the gun range.

And considering how many stories we come across of locals being upset about a range existing simply because of the noise, it’s a shame that suppressors are so hard to get lawfully here in the United States.

It seems a couple of Republicans in the Senate have introduced a bill to do just that.

Two Republican lawmakers introduced legislation to remove certain regulations surrounding firearm suppressors. Rep. Michael Cloud, R-Texas, and Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, are the chief co-sponsors of the Silencers Help Us Save Hearing (SHUSH) Act.

A firearm suppressor, or “silencer,” is a device attached to the muzzle of a firearm to reduce the noise, muzzle flash and recoil generated when the gun is fired. However, a suppressor doesn’t completely mute the sound of a gun firing. Rather, it lowers it by an average of 20 to 35 decibels –– a reduction similar to wearing ear protection.

The congressmen say that under current law, acquiring a silencer is a lengthy process through the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF). Applicants must fill out and submit several documents and provide certification from a local law enforcement officer. They also need to submit two copies of fingerprints, provide two passport photos and pay $200 in federal taxes.

…

The SHUSH Act would remove suppressors from the National Firearms Act (NFA) and Gun Control Act (GCA). It would reclassify them as a standard firearm accessory.

Eight years ago, the SAFE Act was proposed in Congress that would take suppressors off the NFA list, but would still require a background check just like buying a gun. It wasn’t ideal, but it would make it reasonable for more people to get one.

This goes a step further and just treats them like a new stock for your bolt-action or a flashlight mount for your AR-15.

And I’m here for it.

Let’s be real here, by itself, a suppressor is useless. It’s a metal tube with some baffles in it that won’t actually accomplish anything other than making a potentially handy but expensive blunt object. For a suppressor to work as intended, someone needs a gun. If gun control laws on the books work as intended–they don’t, but roll with me here–then easy accessibility of suppressors shouldn’t make a bit of difference.

Since gun control doesn’t work, though, let’s also remember that Luigi Magione reportedly used a 3D-printed suppressor when he killed UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson.

If you can’t keep suppressors out of the hands of assassins who can just download the plans to build one, why are law-abiding citizens being denied what is really a safety device?

The SHUSH Act goes where things should have already been. 

Unfortunately, I’m not sure if it’ll get anywhere in the Senate. There’s still the filibuster Democrats can use and, frankly, too many Republicans are far too squishy on things like this for anyone’s comfort.

Still, here’s hoping I’m wrong on this one.

Read the full article here

You Might Also Like

SAF Files Amicus Brief in Case Challenging Gun-Free Zones at Schools

2 teens arrested after bike-riding mob ganged up on lone victim, viciously punching, kicking, stomping him in broad daylight

Rare police reports found in thrift shop reveal historical crimes

iHeartRadio Music Awards: Kelsea Ballerini, Jenny McCarthy stun on red carpet

Transgender arrested after ATTACKING TP USA president

Share This Article
Facebook X Email Print
Previous Article 2025: The year car prices return to Earth 2025: The year car prices return to Earth
Next Article Top Ten Dumb Things Said…Friday, 01/31 Top Ten Dumb Things Said…Friday, 01/31
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

- Advertisement -
Ad image

Latest News

Biden (?): You’re Damned Right I Ordered The Code Red, or Something
Biden (?): You’re Damned Right I Ordered The Code Red, or Something
Politics
Dems Screech About GOP ‘Gutting Medicaid’ While Ignoring Inconvenient Fact
Dems Screech About GOP ‘Gutting Medicaid’ While Ignoring Inconvenient Fact
Politics
Oklahomans Can Now Display a Gun to Defend Property, Not Just Lives
Oklahomans Can Now Display a Gun to Defend Property, Not Just Lives
News
US Supreme Court unanimously shoots down Mexico in lawsuit alleging gun smuggling to cartels
US Supreme Court unanimously shoots down Mexico in lawsuit alleging gun smuggling to cartels
News
UnitedHealthcare sues The Guardian for defamation on nursing home program claims
UnitedHealthcare sues The Guardian for defamation on nursing home program claims
News
Mexico Pursues Arizona Gun Dealer Lawsuit Post-SCOTUS Ruling
Mexico Pursues Arizona Gun Dealer Lawsuit Post-SCOTUS Ruling
Guns
© 2025 Concealed Republican. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Press Release
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?