Federal judge fumes over Trump administration’s late-night deportation move

A federal judge grilled Trump administration lawyers Friday over their deportation of Venezuelan nationals to El Salvador despite an earlier court order explicitly blocking the move – the latest in a days-long legal dispute that could make its way to the Supreme Court.

During the motion hearing, U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg sharply questioned Deputy Assistant Attorney General Drew Ensign over why the Trump administration failed to comply with an emergency court order that temporarily blocked its use of the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to deport Venezuelan nationals, including alleged members of the gang Tren de Aragua, from U.S. soil for 14 days.

At least 261 migrants were deported Saturday from the U.S. to El Salvador, including more than 100 Venezuelan nationals who were subject to removal “solely on the basis” of the law temporarily blocked by the court.

Boasberg used the first portion of Friday’s hearing to press Ensign for details over the government’s deportation flights to El Salvador.

‘WOEFULLY INSUFFICIENT’: US JUDGE REAMS TRUMP ADMIN FOR DAYS-LATE DEPORTATION INFO

“Why was this proclamation signed in the dark on Friday, early Saturday morning, and then these people rushed onto the planes?” Boasberg asked Justice Department attorneys. “To me, the only reason to do that is if you know the problem, and you want to get them out of the country before a suit is filed.”

Ensign was also pressed at length over what he knew about the deportations during last week’s court hearing, when Boasberg ordered the Trump administration to temporarily halt any planned removals of Venezuelan migrants subject to the Alien Enemies Act.

Boasberg had also issued a bench ruling Saturday ordering the immediate return of any planes deporting the Venezuelan nationals targeted for deportation under the Alien Enemies Act.

“Can I ask you now how you interpreted that statement when we had a conversation on Saturday?” he asked Eisen. “Did you not understand my statement during that hearing?”

“You told me you had no details on the plane flights, then we held a recess for 38 minutes for you to find details,” the judge reminded Ensign. “And then when you came back – and even though the flights were in the air, you represented that you had no details of the flights?” 

“That’s correct,” Ensign responded, telling the judge that no one would give him the information he sought about the deportation flights. “I did not know they were in the air,” he said.

JUDGES V TRUMP: HERE ARE THE KEY COURT BATTLES HALTING THE WHITE HOUSE AGENDA

Boasberg has ordered Trump administration officials to explain by Tuesday why they failed to comply with his order requiring the deportation flights to return, and whether they knowingly defied his ruling and landed in El Salvador. 

Though the judge acknowledged that the Trump administration has “wide latitude” to enforce immigration law, he has repeatedly expressed frustration with the government and its failure to answer major questions about the flights.

He reiterated these concerns Friday, and raised new ones about the administration’s apparent defiance of federal judges.

“The hypotheticals are frightening,” Judge Boasberg told Eisen. “If the courts can’t review” the administration’s use of the wartime-era deportation law, he said, “then the president could say anyone is invading. If some foreign fisherman comes into U.S. waters, the president could say that’s an invasion,” Boasberg noted. 

“Even you would say that’s alarming,” he said.

“That’s up to Congress,” Eisen responded.

WHO IS JAMES BOASBERG, THE US JUDGE AT THE CENTER OF TRUMP’S DEPORTATION EFFORTS?

In a court order filed Thursday, Boasberg castigated lawyers for the Justice Department for failing to answer his questions about the deportation flights, even after he let them do so under seal, noting that the government had “again evaded its obligations.” 

It remains unclear whether the Trump administration will invoke the state secrets privilege in the court battle, which could allow them to withhold certain information for national security purposes.

In a court declaration filed Friday morning, U.S. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche told Boasberg that he is aware of the Cabinet-level discussions invoking that privilege. They could present that argument at an appellate court hearing next week.

Invoking that privilege “is a serious matter that requires careful consideration of national security and foreign relations, and it cannot properly be taken in just 24 hours,” Blanche told the court Friday. 

President Donald Trump, for his part, demanded in a social media post Friday that the Supreme Court move to rein in federal judges who have blocked over 300 of his executive orders and actions. 

In the Truth Social post, Trump imported the Supreme Court intercede to “STOP NATIONWIDE INJUNCTIONS NOW, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE.”

“If Justice Roberts and the United States Supreme Court do not fix this toxic and unprecedented situation IMMEDIATELY, our Country is in very serious trouble!” he said.