Trump Rips SCOTUS for Making Deporting Gang Members a Legal Nightmare

President Donald Trump sharply criticized the U.S. Supreme Court following its recent 7–2 ruling that limited the government’s ability to use the Alien Enemies Act to deport certain foreign nationals without extended legal proceedings.

🚨BREAKING NEWS🚨

Supreme Court (7-2) blocks the Trump administration from deporting gang members under Alien Enemies Act without proper notice. pic.twitter.com/JRRCkRl48q

— Breanna Morello (@BreannaMorello) May 16, 2025

Trump’s Sovereign Wealth Fund: What Could It Mean For Your Money?

Trump warned that the decision will hinder efforts to quickly remove dangerous illegal immigrants and poses a serious threat to national security.

The ruling came in response to a request from Venezuelan nationals who sought to block their removal from the United States.

The Supreme Court sided with the petitioners, stating that the government did not provide them adequate time or resources to contest their deportations.

This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year

The decision effectively restricts the executive branch’s ability to expedite removals under the longstanding Alien Enemies Act, particularly in cases involving individuals from countries viewed as hostile or unstable.

In a statement issued on Truth Social, President Trump expressed strong opposition to the Court’s decision, arguing that it undermines the government’s capacity to promptly remove individuals who pose a threat to public safety.

“The Supreme Court has ruled that the worst murderers, drug dealers, gang members, and even those who are mentally insane, who came into our Country illegally, are not allowed to be forced out without going through a long, protracted, and expensive Legal Process, one that will take, possibly, many years for each person, and one that will allow these people to commit many crimes before they even see the inside of a Courthouse,” Trump wrote.

Trump emphasized that the ruling delays enforcement actions against individuals who, in his view, should be removed from the country swiftly.

He argued that the decision ties the hands of law enforcement and immigration authorities by requiring extended legal proceedings for each individual, even in cases involving criminal behavior or national security concerns.

He further warned that the ruling would likely encourage more illegal immigration by weakening the government’s ability to respond quickly and decisively.

“This decision invites more criminals into our country, knowing they can exploit a broken system and avoid deportation for years,” Trump added.

The president contrasted the Court’s decision with the approach taken by his administration to enforce immigration laws aggressively.

He also criticized the prior policies of former President Joe Biden, stating that the current immigration system—compounded by judicial obstacles—has allowed millions of illegal immigrants to enter the country without proper screening or accountability.

President Trump also thanked Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, the two dissenters in the case, for their opposition to the majority opinion.

Their dissents aligned with the view that the government should retain broad authority to act swiftly in removing foreign nationals deemed to be threats.

The decision has sparked concern among conservative lawmakers and immigration enforcement advocates, who argue that the ruling creates unnecessary legal hurdles and prioritizes procedural technicalities over public safety.

The case marks a significant legal interpretation of the Alien Enemies Act, a law originally enacted in 1798, which grants the president authority to detain and deport nationals from countries with which the United States is at war or deems dangerous.

While the law has rarely been invoked in recent decades, its relevance has resurfaced amid growing concerns about border security and foreign threats.

As of now, the ruling sets a precedent that could shape future immigration enforcement policies and limit the government’s ability to quickly remove individuals without extended judicial review.

The Department of Homeland Security has not yet released a formal statement in response to the decision.

Connect with Vetted Off-Duty Cops to Instantly Fulfill Your Security Needs