By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Concealed RepublicanConcealed Republican
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
Reading: Biden’s “Pistol Brace” is No More After FPC, DOJ Settlement
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Concealed RepublicanConcealed Republican
  • News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Concealed Republican > Blog > News > Biden’s “Pistol Brace” is No More After FPC, DOJ Settlement
News

Biden’s “Pistol Brace” is No More After FPC, DOJ Settlement

Jim Taft
Last updated: July 18, 2025 2:08 pm
By Jim Taft 6 Min Read
Share
Biden’s “Pistol Brace” is No More After FPC, DOJ Settlement
SHARE

While we’re still waiting on the formal repeal of several Biden-era rules put in place by the ATF, the rule treating most brace-equipped pistols as short barreled rifles has been officially erased. 





The Firearms Policy Coalition says it has reached an agreement with the Department of Justice to dismiss the DOJ’s appeal in Mock v. Bondi, which puts an end to the government’s defense of the rule. 

A Fifth Circuit panel had already vacated the rule, but DOJ had continued its appeal. Now that the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division has agreed to end its defense of the rule, the millions of Americans who . 

In a press release, FPC President Brandon Combs called the decision a “great day for freedom and the American people.”

“The dismissal of this appeal should be the final nail in the coffin of this unconstitutional Biden ATF assault on gun owners. As we explained in the case filings, braced pistols are not ‘short-barreled rifles’. But either way, they are unquestionably arms protected under the Second Amendment. We are thrilled to have secured this important win for liberty and excited to take on even more unconstitutional laws so you can exercise your rights when, where, and how you choose.”

“The government is finally retreating from the Biden Administration’s patently unlawful effort to turn millions of peaceable people into felons by decree,” said FPC Action Foundation President Cody J. Wisniewski, an attorney for the challengers. “This horrible rule was a perversion of our system of limited government, so we’re glad to see this case resolved in favor of liberty and the rule of law.”

“This is a clear-cut victory and monumental step in preserving gun rights for future generations and safeguarding the firearms ecosystem from regulatory overreach,” said David Farrell, a Maxim Defense vice president. “This important achievement is the result of tireless dedication from the entire litigation team, not to mention the many supporters who have stood with us every single day. When we fight boldly and stand united, freedom prevails.”





Before the Biden administration adopted the rule that treated most pistols equipped with stabilizing braces as SBRs, the agency had some vague and fuzzy guidelines surrounding the use of braces. 

As FPC noted in its original complaint, in 2012 the ATF’s Firearms and Ammunition Technology Division found that attaching a brace “would not alter the classification of the pistol or other firearm.” Two years later, FATD advised that it “does not classify weapons based on how a particular individual uses a weapon and that merely firing an AR-type pistol from the shoulder did not reclassify it as a short-barreled rifle.”

Then, in an October 2014 letter, ATF momentarily reversed its position,stating that actions such as concealment on the person or the subjective use of a device as a shoulder stock, rather than the objective design criteria, could transformthe weapon’s classification. Later still, in a March 2017 letter, ATF reiterated that “stabilizingbraces are perfectly legal accessories for large handguns or pistols” but that, “when employed as a shoulder stock with a firearm with a barrel less than 16 inches in length, the result would be making an unregistered NFA firearm.”

The Biden rule dropped that test and imposed a rule that basically encouraged owners of brace-equipped pistols to consider them unregistered NFA items. The rule contained a six-factor “balancing” test that relied on subjective determinations rather than providing gun owners with clear, bright lines about what would turn a legal brace-equipped pistol into an illegal short-barreled rifle. 





About a half-dozen lawsuits were filed in response to the ATF’s action, arguing that the agency’s rule violated the Administrative Procedures Act. Given the success that FPC and other 2A groups had already demonstrated, it’s likely that the rule would have been vacated by the Supreme Court in the future, but the dismissal of the litigation saves taxpayers money… and gun owners a lot of time and unnecessary grief. Millions of gun owners could have potentially faced charges for their brace-equipped pistols, but now freedom and common sense have prevalied… at least on this issue. 


Editor’s Note: President Trump and Republicans across the country are doing everything they can to protect our Second Amendment rights and right to self-defense.

Help us continue to report on their efforts and successes. Join Bearing Arms VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership.



Read the full article here

You Might Also Like

Bill Seeks to End Financial Industry’s Discrimination Toward Gun Companies

LGBT activists find devious way to hoist their colors despite flag bans in Salt Lake City, Boise

Scottie Scheffler draws Tiger Woods comparisons from Jason Day ahead of as U.S. Open

SNL takes another swing at Trump and mocks Tesla owners too

Tradition is Great, But So Is Technology

Share This Article
Facebook X Email Print
Previous Article The GOP establishment lost to Trump — now it’s rebranding as ‘neo-MAGA’ The GOP establishment lost to Trump — now it’s rebranding as ‘neo-MAGA’
Next Article It Takes Just One Word For Scott Jennings To Describe America’s Reaction To WSJ Trump-Epstein Story It Takes Just One Word For Scott Jennings To Describe America’s Reaction To WSJ Trump-Epstein Story
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

- Advertisement -
Ad image

Latest News

Rep. Gimenez Moves to Oust Ramirez After ‘Guatemalan Before American’ Comment [WATCH]
Rep. Gimenez Moves to Oust Ramirez After ‘Guatemalan Before American’ Comment [WATCH]
Politics
How caregiving reveals the meaning of biblical marriage
How caregiving reveals the meaning of biblical marriage
News
Texas company creates anti-shooter drone system for school protection
Texas company creates anti-shooter drone system for school protection
News
Royal Caribbean Icon of the Seas Water Slide Breaks, Injuring Passenger [WATCH]
Royal Caribbean Icon of the Seas Water Slide Breaks, Injuring Passenger [WATCH]
Politics
Child advocate blames Democrat governor for 6th child death related to family safety dept: ‘There is blood on the governor’
Child advocate blames Democrat governor for 6th child death related to family safety dept: ‘There is blood on the governor’
News
Nebraska, South Dakota, Vermont block charter schools despite pressure
Nebraska, South Dakota, Vermont block charter schools despite pressure
News
© 2025 Concealed Republican. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Press Release
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?