The legacy media’s double standard for Christian politicians was on full display last week.
Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.) is a lawmaker known for speaking openly about his Christian faith. Last week, he appeared on “CBS Mornings Plus” to promote his new book, “One Nation Always Under God: Profiles in Christian Courage.” But instead of asking about the book, CBS News anchor Adriana Diaz chose to challenge the legitimacy of Scott’s faith with a now-familiar line of attack.
The faith test becomes just another political weapon — one wielded not to clarify the truth but to embarrass political opponents.
“As a practicing Christian, how do you reconcile your support for President Trump when many people see his actions as lacking Christian values?” Diaz asked.
It’s the same question we’ve heard repeatedly asked of Trump-supporting Christians, and, to his credit, Scott did not flinch.
But the question reveals something much bigger than Scott, Trump, or even the Republican Party. It exposes the media’s asymmetrical “faith test” — one applied rigorously to Trump-supporting conservatives but never to Democrats.
Faith on trial
The question itself is a rhetorical sleight of hand. It implies that supporting Trump is inherently anti-Christian and that real Christianity is whatever Trump isn’t. By that logic, Scott stands guilty until proven innocent.
But the problem isn’t just the question. It’s the blatant double standard.
If it’s fair to interrogate Tim Scott on whether his support for President Trump squares with the teachings of Jesus, then surely it’s fair game to press professing Christian Democrats on whether the policies and people they support align with Christian theology and ethics, right?
Except that almost never happens.
When was the last time a news anchor interrogated a Democrat — like former President Joe Biden, Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), or Sen. Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.), for instance — on how the support for abortion comports with 2,000 years of unambiguous Christian teachings about protecting innocent life, especially of the unborn?
Has any Democrat, for that matter, been grilled on whether endorsing the LGBTQ agenda — including radical trans procedures for children — is consistent with biblical ethics?
If such questions have been asked of Democrats, they’ve gone unnoticed, which is telling because these aren’t minor theological quibbles. They’re fundamental biblical issues, and Christianity has been clear-eyed about them for thousands of years.
Tested, then twisted
Diaz’s question reveals an underlying assumption: that Christianity naturally aligns with progressive politics.
That’s why journalists feel compelled to question Trump-supporting Christians about the congruency of their politics and theology, but never think to challenge a Democrat for supporting policies that clearly contradict Christian orthodoxy and biblical teaching. It’s because they don’t recognize or perceive the obvious inconsistency.
This double standard is as dangerous as it is subversive.
It redefines Christianity in the public imagination, not as an ancient faith with its own transcendent moral authority, but as a soft and therapeutic set of values (i.e., tolerance, inclusion, “compassion”), conveniently shaped to match the political priorities of the left.
RELATED: How the liberal media twists ‘church and state’ to hide what it truly fears
The media isn’t actually interested in theological nuance or serious conversations about faith and politics. Their agenda is clear: to police the boundaries of acceptable public religion.
And in their eyes, supporting Trump is a grave sin.
If journalists truly believe that public officials should be held accountable to the moral standards of their faith, that’s fine. But that standard must be applied equally. You can’t grill Republicans for supporting Trump but never interrogate Democrats championing abortion, the LGBTQ agenda, and the destruction of the traditional family.
Otherwise, the “faith test” becomes just another political weapon — one wielded not to clarify the truth but to embarrass political opponents who dissent from the liberal consensus.
Sacred spin shattered
If the press were honest and intellectually serious, they would apply the faith test fairly.
It would look something like this:
- Mr. Biden, as a Catholic, how do you reconcile Roman Catholic teaching on the sanctity of life with your support for abortion?
- Mrs. Pelosi, how does your Christian faith inform your views on marriage and family policy?
- Mr. Warnock, how do you interpret biblical passages on protecting vulnerable life in light of your support for abortion and the trans agenda?
These aren’t “gotcha” questions. They’re parallel to what Scott faced last week — only aimed in the other direction. And if politicians can’t answer these questions without spin and deflection, that would tell us something important.
Scott handled himself with grace and focus. But Trump-supporting Republicans shouldn’t be the only side forced to reconcile their faith and politics on the public stage. If the media wants to play referee on Christian consistency, they need to enforce the rules on both sides.
Fairness — and honesty — demands equal scrutiny.
Anything less is not journalism. It’s partisanship dressed up as moral concern, and it’s why Americans no longer trust the mainstream press.
Diaz tried to weaponize Christ against Scott and MAGA Christians. But the shot backfired, exposing yet another double standard in the media.
Read the full article here
