Several Senate Democrats announced plans to oppose an appropriations bill that includes funding for the Department of Homeland Security following a Border Patrol shooting in Minneapolis on Saturday, raising questions about the future of the legislation and broader government funding.
The announcements came in the aftermath of the shooting involving Border Patrol agents on the streets of Minneapolis, an incident that has drawn national attention and renewed debate over immigration enforcement and federal law enforcement activity.
Warning: Account balances and purchasing power no longer tell the same story. Know in 2 minutes if your retirement is working for you.
Sen. Mark Warner, a Democrat from Virginia, publicly stated that he would not support the bill.
Trump’s endless empowerment of federal immigration agents has resulted in yet another senseless killing. This brutal crackdown has to end.
I cannot and will not vote to fund DHS while this administration continues these violent federal takeovers of our cities.
— Mark Warner (@MarkWarner) January 24, 2026
This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year
His position was followed by similar announcements from other Democrats who had previously voted with Republicans to end the last government shutdown.
Among those senators were Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada and Sen. Jacky Rosen of Nevada, both of whom indicated they would now oppose the legislation after the Minneapolis incident.
The opposition escalated after Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York released a statement placing blame on President Donald Trump and signaling that Democrats would not advance the appropriations bill if it includes DHS funding.
“What’s happening in Minnesota is appalling —and unacceptable in any American city,” Schumer said.
“Democrats sought common sense reforms in the Department of Homeland Security spending bill, but because of Republicans’ refusal to stand up to President Trump, the DHS bill is woefully inadequate to rein in the abuses of ICE. I will vote no. Senate Democrats will not provide the votes to proceed to the appropriations bill if the DHS funding bill is included.”
This all but assures a government shutdown at the end of the month. https://t.co/qRBxqm2ama
— Bill Melugin (@BillMelugin_) January 25, 2026
The stance taken by Schumer and other Senate Democrats places the DHS portion of the appropriations package in doubt.
The bill includes funding not only for Immigration and Customs Enforcement but also for other agencies within DHS.
ICE has already received additional funding through the One Big Beautiful Bill.
The funding currently under debate in the appropriations bill includes items such as body cameras, which Democrats had previously supported as a transparency measure.
According to reporting referenced in the debate, Fox News correspondent Bill Melugin said that failure to pass the appropriations bill would have broader consequences beyond ICE.
Melugin reported that agencies such as the Transportation Security Administration and the Federal Emergency Management Agency would be more significantly affected if the bill does not move forward.
The developments come as tensions remain high following the Minneapolis shooting and the unrest that followed.
Democrats opposing the bill have pointed to concerns over ICE operations and DHS enforcement actions, while Republicans have argued that blocking DHS funding would disrupt essential government functions.
The appropriations bill requires bipartisan support to advance in the Senate, making Democratic opposition a significant obstacle.
With multiple senators publicly stating their intent to vote against the measure, the prospects for passage remain uncertain.
The funding dispute adds another layer of complexity to ongoing disagreements between congressional Democrats and the Trump administration over immigration enforcement, federal law enforcement authority, and the scope of DHS operations.
As of now, Senate leadership has not announced a revised plan for advancing the appropriations bill without DHS funding, and it remains unclear whether negotiations will resume or if the funding fight could lead to a broader government shutdown scenario.
The situation continues to develop as lawmakers weigh their next steps in the wake of the Minneapolis incident and its political fallout.
Read the full article here


