By now, everybody is familiar with how absurdly stacked the political system is in California.
The “jungle primary” system was introduced to almost ensure that the top two candidates who make it onto the general election ballot are Democrats, and a while back, when it looked like two Republicans might achieve that this year, Governor Newsom assured Democrats that there was a “Break Glass in Case of Emergency” contingency to ensure that a Democrat would win the election anyway.
When asked about the possibility of ending up with two Republican candidates for governor and no Democrats, Gavin Newsom responded:
“We all have agencies. We can shape the future… I don’t anticipate this need to be the case, but there is a ‘break the glass scenario.’ There’s… pic.twitter.com/b4Glz0neVu
— Laura Powell (@LauraPowellEsq) May 15, 2026
When asked about the possibility of ending up with two Republican candidates for governor and no Democrats, Gavin Newsom responded:
“We all have agencies. We can shape the future… I don’t anticipate this need to be the case, but there is a ‘break the glass scenario.’ There’s many people that have a deep understanding of what it would look like if Democrats were locked out, and we’re going to do everything to make sure that doesn’t happen. I’ll leave it there.”
It would be nice if he gave a hint about what lengths he intends to go to in order to ensure a Democrat wins. 🤨
He didn’t specify exactly what that was, but it was an admission that the system is rigged. “Don’t worry folks, we control elections.”
As Stalin once said, “Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything.”
Of course, the jungle primary is only one mechanism the Democrats use to rig the elections. The bigger one is the utterly insane mail-in voting rules, which ensure that in close elections, or even not-so-close elections, votes will continue to be counted for weeks.
Seriously. Weeks.
Like honestly “it’s going to take us several weeks to tell you who won the election” is failed state shit and should be much more stigmatized.
— Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) June 2, 2026
Almost every developed country can tell you who won an election the day of the election, or perhaps the next morning. France can do it. We knew the results in the UK council elections almost immediately. Ecuador announced its results the night of the election, using hand-counted paper ballots and having representatives from each party present to ensure fairness.
It’s not complicated. And as any election-integrity official can tell you when monitoring foreign elections, one major red flag for election fraud is when results take an unusually long time to report.
NBC says the quiet part out loud
LA won’t have results tonight because tonz of mail-in ballots will be arriving over the next few days which will help the Democrats
This is how they cheat pic.twitter.com/J3UctgU5Cr
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) June 3, 2026
“Mail-in ballots!,” we are told. Which is, of course, true, and California’s process for counting mail-in ballots creates enormous opportunities for fraud. Ballots don’t have to be date-stamped, and can arrive for days after the election, and as all the TV commentators are telling you, you can expect them to be shockingly Blue.
NBC Reporting that Mayor Karen Bass is preparing for a party
Karen Bass says even if Spencer takes the lead, she says when all the votes are counted she’ll be victorious
Mail in ballots will continue being counted FOR A FULL WEEK after Election Day
Transition: Democrats will… pic.twitter.com/OQE77UMQhj
— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) June 3, 2026
We are told that this is due to strategic voting by savvy political operators, and indicates nothing about shenanigans.
But seriously…why do you believe them? We never would in Venezuela, or any third-world country. The “believe us” argument is absurd, and merely calling accusations of voter fraud “debunked” repeatedly isn’t an argument; it’s a propaganda tactic to make questioning the methods impossible without sounding nutty.
We have VIDEO of election fraud, and we still are told it never happens. The people DOING the election fraud on camera are often funded by the state through grants, but don’t worry, paying homeless people to vote is rare! No illegal aliens vote! People register at postbox addresses because they happen to live in a UPS store!
I’m sure the massive, post-election vote dumps will boost leftist candidates. Taking days or weeks to count votes and announce the results is a joke. pic.twitter.com/onEI0cIJAP
— Ron DeSantis (@RonDeSantis) June 3, 2026
Zeek Arkham’s question is a good one: why is it that EVERY time there is a late vote dump, it is overwhelmingly Democrat? Why do media folks have to report that early surprise totals for Republicans may get wiped away by votes that are banked and uncounted?
Because it is assumed that vote dumps always help Democrats. It is an iron law of nature. Or, should I say, vote rigging.
Sincere question because I honestly just want to see something:
Has there ever been a time when a Republican was behind and a bunch of late mail-in ballots pushed him or her into the lead?
If not, why aren’t Republicans ready to burn the ships over this? https://t.co/sLXX67N2rp
— Zeek Arkham 🇺🇸 (@ZeekArkham) June 3, 2026
Despite the fact that almost every Republican rightly suspects that Democrats rig votes where and when they can, the Democrats do absolutely nothing to put in place ballot security measures. In fact, they do the opposite, and fight basic measures such as cleaning dead and moved people from voter rolls, despite this being in federal law. Hundreds of ballots are mailed to single addresses, and that is normal and expected, because those homeless drug addicts are deeply invested in elections and take time off from ingesting that government-provided fentanyl to cast their ballots for Democrats!
Yeah.
https://t.co/d27Hs1XpFr
— Jim Geraghty (@jimgeraghty) June 3, 2026
Under California law, if a “vote-by-mail ballot identification envelope has no dated postmark, the postmark is illegible, and there is no date stamp for receipt from a bona fide private mail delivery service, but the voter has dated the vote-by-mail ballot identification envelope or the envelope otherwise indicates that the ballot was executed on or before Election Day and the ballot was received by the elections official in accordance with” the law, the ballot can still be counted.
Now, put aside your beliefs on how widespread voter fraud is. Do you think it is a good idea to have one uniform date for all ballots to be due? Or do you think it better to have in-person voting completed on the first Tuesday of the month, and mail-in-ballot collection completed the second Tuesday of the month? Why do states believe it makes sense to have different deadlines for different types of ballots cast in the same election?
The sole argument Democrats have for trusting this system is…insulting anybody who doesn’t. Claiming that any charges of voter fraud are debunked. Voting fraud NEVER happens, so we should take no measures to ensure it doesn’t, because that is Jim Crow 2.0!
That’s third-world crap. The kind of argument that gets Cuba or Venezuela-style elections.
Now even rigged systems can sometimes be beaten by large enough voter turnouts. You can occasionally win beyond the margin of cheating. But that is not an argument against the claim the system is rigged; just that the rigging system is not infallible.
If Democrats really cared about assuring everyone that the system was not rigged, they would make it easier to ensure that the eligible voter rolls were free of illegal voters, that the rules ensured that ballots were legally cast, that the vote-counting procedure was utterly transparent, and that the results were reported expeditiously.
The farther away from that model, the more doubt you cast on the results. And spare me the “election denialist” crap. Democrats challenge every close election and claim fraud when Republicans win. Stacey Abrams made her career on it. Ask Hillary! whether she lost the 2016 election.
Democrats’ arguments are hand-waving and shouting to make you shut up. But show California election procedures to officials or voters in any country, and they would think that Hugo Chavez wrote them. If the Carter Center were monitoring an election in Africa with those rules, they would deny certification.
Nate Silver is right. This is absurd, although I doubt he would outright claim that it is proof of fraud.
I think it is prima facie evidence that the system is rigged.
Editor’s Note: The mainstream media continues to deflect, gaslight, spin, and lie about President Trump, his administration, and conservatives.
Help us continue to expose their left-wing bias by reading news you can trust. Join HotAir VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.
Read the full article here
