By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Concealed RepublicanConcealed Republican
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
Reading: SCOTUS Keeps Hardware Bans on Hold, but Makes Interesting Move on Prohibited Person Case
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Concealed RepublicanConcealed Republican
  • News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Concealed Republican > Blog > News > SCOTUS Keeps Hardware Bans on Hold, but Makes Interesting Move on Prohibited Person Case
News

SCOTUS Keeps Hardware Bans on Hold, but Makes Interesting Move on Prohibited Person Case

Jim Taft
Last updated: June 8, 2026 5:40 pm
By Jim Taft 5 Min Read
Share
SCOTUS Keeps Hardware Bans on Hold, but Makes Interesting Move on Prohibited Person Case
SHARE

Yet again, the Supreme Court’s orders from its weekly conference have been released with no news on any of the five lawsuits challenging bans on so-called assault weapons and large capacity magazines. 





Sorry, 19th*.

I forgot one was a reschedule.

— Kostas Moros (@MorosKostas) June 8, 2026

I still think SCOTUS is waiting on the Third Circuit to issue its en banc opinion in the challenges to New Jersey’s gun and magazine ban, which could create a circuit court split on the constitutionality of banning commonly-owned arms. As some have theorized, though, the Third Circuit could be waiting on SCOTUS to issue its opinions in Wolford v. Lopez and U.S. v. Hemani to see if those decisions will provide any guidance to lower courts. 

If that is the case, then we’re not getting a Third Circuit decision before the Court adjourns for its summer recess, and what the justices will do with the five hardware cases at the end of this term is anyone’s guess. They could keep the lawsuits on ice over the summer, but that would be pretty unusual. I’m hoping they’ll break with tradition and hold the cases over, but if not then a a grant, vacate, and remand would still be better than an outright rejection, even if it means these cases won’t be back before the Court for several more years.

The justices did make one decision today that will benefit some gun owners. 

The cert petition filed by the federal government in a case where the Fifth Circuit ruled that the felon gun ban is unconstitutional as applied to the defendant whose “sole predicate offense… is his failure to pay child support” has been denied. https://t.co/ZNffWkgYWN pic.twitter.com/HvVCK0vUBX

— Firearms Policy Coalition (@gunpolicy) June 8, 2026





That means that the Fifth Circuit’s decision stands, and at least in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas, failure to pay child support will not, by itself, lead to an automatic revocation of the right to keep and bear arms, at least as long as no debt remains outstanding.  

Solicitor General D. John Sauer had requested the court hang on to Cockerham until the Hemani decision was released, before granting cert, vacating the lower court’s decision, and sending the case back to the Fifth Circuit for further review. Instead, SCOTUS simply turned away the government’s challenge to the Fifth Circuit decision and let it stand.  

That doesn’t necessarily mean that the Supreme Court agrees with the Fifth Circuit’s decision or how it got there, but it would have been a pretty simple thing to do as Sauer requested, and the justices chose to simply dismiss the government’s appeal outright.

Edward Cockerham pled guilty to possessing a firearm as a prohibited person based on a felony conviction for failure to pay child support; a crime for which he was not sentenced to prison. The Fifth Circuit ruled that Cockerham’s failure to pay child support was historically analogous to failure to pay a debt, and in the Founding era once the debt was paid the debtor was released from prison with no further punishment. A lifetime ban on possessing firearms, particularly when Cockerham had squared up his child support payments, is untenable under the Supreme Court’s “text, history, and tradition” test, according to the Fifth Circuit. 





The Fifth Circuit didn’t weigh in on whether a prohibition on gun possession would be okay if Cockerham hadn’t paid the child support he owed, so there are some circumstances where Section 922(g)(1) might still be applied going forward. SCOTUS could, however, cast more doubt on lifetime prohibitions on gun possession for non-violent offenses depending on how broadly the justices rule in Hemani; a decision that come come as early as Thursday of this week.  


Editor’s Note: The radical Left will stop at nothing to enact their radical gun control agenda and strip us of our Second Amendment rights.

Help us continue to report on and expose the Democrats’ gun control policies and schemes. Join Bearing Arms VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.





Read the full article here

You Might Also Like

New Book Shows When It Comes to Gun Control, Nothing New Under the Sun

First baby Asian elephant born at Smithsonian’s National Zoo after 25 years

Cowboys suffer consecutive losing seasons, as Dak Prescott is benched and defender is ejected in lopsided loss

Photo of suspect’s bloody undershirt in Austin attack suggests link to Iran

Anna Paulina Luna refers Tim Walz and AG Keith Ellison for criminal charges: ‘May justice be swift’

Share This Article
Facebook X Email Print
Previous Article Stu Burguiere reveals the ‘worst part’ of Graham Platner’s sexting scandal: ‘The part that’s going to turn your stomach’ Stu Burguiere reveals the ‘worst part’ of Graham Platner’s sexting scandal: ‘The part that’s going to turn your stomach’
Next Article Congress Passing Legislation At Historically Low Clip Congress Passing Legislation At Historically Low Clip
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

- Advertisement -
Ad image

Latest News

Donald Trump Jr. and Bettina Anderson Discuss What’s Next After Fairytale Wedding [WATCH]
Donald Trump Jr. and Bettina Anderson Discuss What’s Next After Fairytale Wedding [WATCH]
Politics
Jacoby Brissett Set to Report for Cardinals Minicamp Amid Contract Holdout
Jacoby Brissett Set to Report for Cardinals Minicamp Amid Contract Holdout
Politics
Ukraine Is Not Losing, ‘Grandpa’ is Not Winning
Ukraine Is Not Losing, ‘Grandpa’ is Not Winning
Politics
Congress Passing Legislation At Historically Low Clip
EXCLUSIVE: Chip Roy Moves To Make Trump’s ‘Vulnerable’ Border Policies Permanent
Politics
First Amendment Challenge to ‘Come and Take It’ Hat Ban Denied by Supreme Court
First Amendment Challenge to ‘Come and Take It’ Hat Ban Denied by Supreme Court
News
Glenn Beck unveils the TRUTH about Scott Pelley’s FIRING from ’60 Minutes’
Glenn Beck unveils the TRUTH about Scott Pelley’s FIRING from ’60 Minutes’
News
© 2025 Concealed Republican. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Press Release
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?