By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Concealed RepublicanConcealed Republican
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
Reading: 2A Orgs File Brief in California Challenge of Gun Ban for Adults Under 21
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Concealed RepublicanConcealed Republican
  • News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Concealed Republican > Blog > News > 2A Orgs File Brief in California Challenge of Gun Ban for Adults Under 21
News

2A Orgs File Brief in California Challenge of Gun Ban for Adults Under 21

Jim Taft
Last updated: July 1, 2025 9:14 pm
By Jim Taft 6 Min Read
Share
2A Orgs File Brief in California Challenge of Gun Ban for Adults Under 21
SHARE

Nothing describes the way the Second Amendment is viewed as a second-class right by far too many lawmakers as bans preventing adults under 21 from buying guns.

We wouldn’t do this with any other right, either one protected by the Constitution or otherwise. No one would consider saying police only need a warrant to search your car if you’re over 21. No one would say that you don’t have the right to voice your opinion if you’re not also old enough to buy a beer. So why is the right to keep and bear arms any different?





Ultimately, it’s not, but some places act like it is.

Take California. (Please?)

They’re a prime example, and there’s a challenge trying to end their ban on gun sales to adults under 21. The Second Amendment Foundation has just filed a brief, along with its partners, on this challenge.

Via a press release sent on Monday:

The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) and its partners have their opening appellate brief with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in PWGG v. Bonta (formerly Jones v. Bonta), SAF’s challenge to California’s firearm purchase ban for adults under 21 years old. 

Adults under the age of 21 in California are effectively banned from purchasing firearms, including semiautomatic centerfire rifles of any type. Originally filed in 2019, the lawsuit presents a simple yet profound question: May a peaceable citizen of this nation, legally dependent on no one but himself or herself for care and protection, nevertheless be deprived of the right to keep and bear arms on account of age? The protections codified by the Second Amendment say no.

“California lawmakers believe they can vote away the fundamental rights of a subset of the adult population,” said SAF Director of Legal Operations Bill Sack. “But fortunately for all Americans, the rights codified in our Constitution are memorialized there to prevent precisely that sort of behavior. Imagine if you will, extending that capability to other fundamental rights. Perhaps the California legislature would prefer 19-year-olds not have free speech, or the right to be free from unreasonable search or seizure. Gun rights are not second-class rights, and their deprivation is no less egregious.”   

SAF is joined in the case by the Firearms Policy Coalition and California Gun Rights Coalition, along with two licensed firearms dealers – Poway Weapons and Gear and North County Shooting Center. 

As noted in the brief, “The Second Amendment’s plain text extends to cover the right of ‘the people to keep and bear arms.’ ‘The people’ encompasses, as the Supreme Court has already held, all Americans.”

“The purchase restrictions on 18-20-year-olds in California is nothing more than the normal fearmongering we expect out of the state,” said SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb. “The discriminatory practice of banning a certain age of adult from acquiring firearms in California is an affront to the peaceable citizens who wish to exercise their full Second Amendment rights. This case has dragged on long enough and it is past time for this issue to be resolved to allow adults of all ages in California to purchase firearms.” 





It should be noted that I routinely see reports of people under 21 being arrested for various crimes in California who are also found in possession of a firearm, usually a handgun. It seems ample evidence that if even the federal prohibition on selling certain guns to people under 21, there’s no chance of the state’s ban on other guns for the same age group is going to do anything to reduce violent crime.

I mean, it hasn’t so far.

As noted above, the question isn’t about juveniles who can’t make decisions for themselves lawfully and can’t live on their own, thus having to be responsible for their own safety. It’s about adults who can, and this law means that many of them are unable to make their own decisions on whether or not to own a firearm. Instead, the state has made it for them.

Again, this is something no one would seriously suggest for any other civil liberty. If they even tried, they’d be laughed out of the legislature for it, and no court would even consider taking it seriously should it pass. There are lines that we’re not willing to cross with other rights.

Yet for guns, this is routine. It’s considered acceptable.

I’d have more respect for these people if they’d just admit that they see it as a second-class right at best and, for most of them, something that should be relegated to the status of a privilege. 





So yeah, I’m hoping this case works out well. I’m sick of seeing adults under 21 be deprived of basic, constitutionally protected rights simply because the Karens of the country think they’re too young to have it.





Read the full article here

You Might Also Like

Supreme Court won’t hear case on student punished for anti-trans shirt

Johnson narrowly secures speakership despite Republican defectors

Ex-middle school teacher slapped with felony charges over accusations of shocking student sex scandal

Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds defended by talent agency CEO Ari Emanuel who says he ‘fired’ Justin Baldoni

Anti-ICE riots spark strong statement from Angel City FC

Share This Article
Facebook X Email Print
Previous Article CNN’s fake news fumble: Shaky anonymous sources backfire as Trump’s Iran strike proves devastating CNN’s fake news fumble: Shaky anonymous sources backfire as Trump’s Iran strike proves devastating
Next Article EXCLUSIVE: Chip Roy Explains Why He’s A No On Senate-Passed Version Of Trump’s Megabill EXCLUSIVE: Chip Roy Explains Why He’s A No On Senate-Passed Version Of Trump’s Megabill
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

- Advertisement -
Ad image

Latest News

Donald Trump Says Mamdani Will Face Arrest if He Blocks ICE Operations in NYC [WATCH]
Donald Trump Says Mamdani Will Face Arrest if He Blocks ICE Operations in NYC [WATCH]
Politics
Bryan Kohberger to Plead Guilty (Victim’s Family Upset)
Bryan Kohberger to Plead Guilty (Victim’s Family Upset)
Politics
EXCLUSIVE: Chip Roy Explains Why He’s A No On Senate-Passed Version Of Trump’s Megabill
Chinese Operatives Spent Years Spying On Navy Bases In US, FBI Alleges
Politics
Trans ideology’s newest victim | Blaze Media
Trans ideology’s newest victim | Blaze Media
News
Alabama violated constitutional rights of man sentenced to death, court rules
Alabama violated constitutional rights of man sentenced to death, court rules
News
Major Candy Company Joins RFK Jr.’s MAHA Push to Clean Up U.S. Food Supply
Major Candy Company Joins RFK Jr.’s MAHA Push to Clean Up U.S. Food Supply
Politics
© 2025 Concealed Republican. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Press Release
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?