By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Concealed RepublicanConcealed Republican
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
Reading: Colorado Democrats: State can save money by funding abortion, killing 30% more babies
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Concealed RepublicanConcealed Republican
  • News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Concealed Republican > Blog > News > Colorado Democrats: State can save money by funding abortion, killing 30% more babies
News

Colorado Democrats: State can save money by funding abortion, killing 30% more babies

Jim Taft
Last updated: March 28, 2025 12:24 pm
By Jim Taft 11 Min Read
Share
Colorado Democrats: State can save money by funding abortion, killing 30% more babies
SHARE

Colorado Democrats are more than willing to blow taxpayer money on programs for illegal aliens; however, when it comes to coverage for American mothers and their unborn babies, they will apparently appeal to lethal ways to reduce spending.

State Democrats are advancing legislation that would enshrine the right to abortion in the state constitution; require the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing to fund abortions for Medicaid and Child Health Plan Plus program participants using taxpayer dollars; and force public employee insurance plans to fund abortions for plan members — something they are not presently required to do.

Senate Bill 183 — a consequence of Colorado voters’ overwhelming support last year for Colorado Amendment 79, which set the stage for the use of public funds for abortion — passed the state Senate in a 22-12 party-line vote on March 12.

Prior to the bill passing the committee on health and human services on Tuesday, Colorado House Speaker Julie McCluskie (D), a prime sponsor of the legislation, indicated that the use of taxpayer funds to kill babies could save the state a little bit of money.

“That savings comes from the averted births that will not occur because abortions happened instead,” McCluskie said in a video shared to social media. “So a birth is more expensive than an abortion — so the saving comes in Medicaid births that will not occur.”

“This bill will actually decrease costs for our health care policy and financing department, our Medicaid expenditures, in both this year and out years as the savings from averted births outweigh the costs of covering reproductive health care for all Coloradans,” continued McCluskie, who was endorsed last year by Planned Parenthood.

‘Abortion care services represent a one-time expenditure.’

While the Colorado House speaker indicated the state will initially see an “increase to general fund of $1.5 million,” over time, the taxpayer-subsidized elimination of human life will ultimately lead to “cost savings.”

McCluskie was referencing a state fiscal analysis that made the following assumptions and assertions:

  • 333,330 women ages 15 to 44 will be enrolled in Medicaid or the Child Health Plan Plus program in fiscal year 2025-2026;
  • 1.67% of members from this cohort will seek abortions each year;
  • 50.4% of abortions will be performed “procedurally” and 49.6% will be chemical abortions;
  • “abortion procedures are assumed to be reimbursed at a rate of $1,300, and medication abortions are assumed to be reimbursed at a rate of $800”;
  • taxpayer-funded abortions through Medicaid/CHP+ will increase the number of unborn babies killed by 30%; and
  • the average reimbursement cost for child birth is $3,850, which is funded by state and federal programs.

According to Democrats’ calculus, abortions will not only save the state on total reimbursement costs for the delivery of children but will likely also spare the state from having to deal with additional costs that might arise in relation to human beings whose lives they failed to “avert.”

“Medicaid-covered births typically involve additional social safety net impacts for the child, whereas abortion care services represent a one-time expenditure. These impacts have not been addressed in this fiscal note,” said the fiscal note on SB 183.

“On net, the bill will decrease costs for HCPF by about $286,000 in FY 2025-26 and $573,000 in FY 2026-27 and ongoing,” continued the fiscal note. “These impacts are the net result of increased costs for abortion services and decreased costs from averted births.”

State Rep. Kenneth G. DeGraaf (R) tweeted, “Holy Human-Haters, Batman! ‘Killing people is less expensive than caring for them’ coming soon from a eugenicist near you.”

“Paying for abortions for low income women will save our state millions of dollars on ‘averted births,'” wrote Republican state Rep. Brandi Bradley. “Margaret Sanger would be so proud.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!



Read the full article here

You Might Also Like

Fox News Politics Newsletter: Trump Blasts DEI at the FAA

Rubio destroys CBS News anchor with facts after she tries blaming Holocaust on free speech

Actor Richard Gere planning on returning to the US after a few years in Spain

Semisonic blasts Trump administration’s ‘Closing Time’ deportation video

US citizen killed by IED near US-Mexico border, says Texas agriculture commissioner

Share This Article
Facebook X Email Print
Previous Article Trump ally Donalds kicking off campaign in race to succeed Florida Gov. DeSantis Trump ally Donalds kicking off campaign in race to succeed Florida Gov. DeSantis
Next Article Western Governments Choosing Between Two Paths: Suicide or Renewal Western Governments Choosing Between Two Paths: Suicide or Renewal
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

- Advertisement -
Ad image

Latest News

Elon Musk’s DOGE Replacement Revealed, Democrats Are Not Going to be Happy
Elon Musk’s DOGE Replacement Revealed, Democrats Are Not Going to be Happy
Politics
Chuck Todd Accidentally Admits That Media Just Prints What Their Sources Say
Chuck Todd Accidentally Admits That Media Just Prints What Their Sources Say
Politics
New Poll Finds Most Californians Want Good Guys with Guns in Schools
New Poll Finds Most Californians Want Good Guys with Guns in Schools
News
Mandatory speed limiters for all new cars — will American drivers stand for it?
Mandatory speed limiters for all new cars — will American drivers stand for it?
News
House adds Medicaid work requirements, EV mandate rollback to Trump agenda bill
House adds Medicaid work requirements, EV mandate rollback to Trump agenda bill
News
Trump Strikes Trade Breakthrough With China After Tariff Showdown [WATCH]
Trump Strikes Trade Breakthrough With China After Tariff Showdown [WATCH]
Politics
© 2025 Concealed Republican. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Press Release
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?