By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Concealed RepublicanConcealed Republican
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
Reading: Everytown’s Suppressor Hysterics Downright Hysterical
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Concealed RepublicanConcealed Republican
  • News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Concealed Republican > Blog > News > Everytown’s Suppressor Hysterics Downright Hysterical
News

Everytown’s Suppressor Hysterics Downright Hysterical

Jim Taft
Last updated: May 15, 2025 6:58 pm
By Jim Taft 6 Min Read
Share
Everytown’s Suppressor Hysterics Downright Hysterical
SHARE

The term “hysterical” comes from the word “hysteria.” It’s meant to convey the kind of laughter someone engages in when they’re completely out of their minds, either temporarily or permanently, though we now use it just to signify something is really, really funny.

See? We’re an educational website.

Anyway, about hysteria and hysterical things. Cam talked about Brady’s hysteria yesterday. I’m not going to talk about that again. Instead, let’s talk about Everytown for Gun Safety in America. They’re good at hysteria. It’s their stock and trade, if we’re being honest.

Yet even for them, their hysteria over suppressors is some next-level stuff.

Bottom Line: Silencers pose a significant danger in the wrong hands, making it harder for bystanders or law enforcement to identify and react quickly to gunshots. In an active shooter situation, for example, hearing and recognizing a gunshot can be a matter of life and death. But radical legislation—misleadingly called the “Hearing Protection Act,” and now part of the SHARE Act—would make it easy for criminals to obtain silencers by removing silencers from the National Firearms Act (NFA). The NFA has kept silencers out of criminal hands for over eighty years, without blocking access for law-abiding citizens. The gun lobby presents this legislation as an attempt to protect shooters’ hearing, but silencers are not the most effective or the safest way to do so. Widely available ear protection products work better than silencers to protect hearing and safety—which is why the U.S. military relies on them, not silencers, to protect soldiers’ hearing. Lawmakers should join law enforcement officers and major law enforcement organizations in rejecting the Hearing Protection Act and the gun lobby’s dangerous pursuit of profit over safety.

The Hearing Protection Act would enable felons, domestic abusers, and other people with dangerous histories to buy silencers with no background check whatsoever.

  • The NFA, which was passed in 1934 to fight organized crime, requires all buyers of silencers, machine guns, and other especially dangerous weapons to pass criminal background checks and comply with other common-sense safety provisions.
  • The legislation would strip this requirement for silencers. And — for the first time in 80 years — felons, domestic abusers, and people with dangerous mental illnesses would be able to buy silencers with no background check, simply by finding an unlicensed seller.
  • Removing silencers from the NFA would undermine the law’s success in keeping the public, and law enforcement officers, safe from crime. Research shows the use of silenced firearms in crime is rare, demonstrating the NFA works to keep silencers out of the wrong hands.

First, let’s address the validity of their claim that ear protection is better at protecting hearing than suppressors. That’s absolutely true. While some suppressors work well enough, you don’t need hearing protection at the range, many don’t.

But this isn’t just about the shooter’s hearing. It also helps minimize the damage to anyone else at the range who might have had their ear muffs off or their earplugs out when someone fires a weapon. It’s also good for protecting the hearing of family members during a defensive gun use scenario that takes place inside the home.

It minimizes the annoyance of neighbors who live near gun ranges and can go a very long way to normalizing relationships between those neighbors and the ranges.

While ear protection might be the best, it’s not always there when you need it.

And that doesn’t get into flash suppression or anything like that, which the anti-gunners either ignore or pretend that’s a sign of criminality.

Now, let’s talk about the supposed fact that now, dangerous people can get suppressors. To that, I say, “So what?”

Suppressors are nothing more than expensive bludgeoning devices without a gun to attach them to. If gun control works so well, then what does it matter if people can get suppressors? If it works, they won’t have guns to attach them to, right?

“But we know people still get guns,” they’d likely reply, which is true. They still will.

To that, I simply point out that if they can get guns without gun control stopping them, then they’ll get suppressors if they want them, too. Luigi Magione allegedly had a 3D-printed suppressor that he used in his alleged assassination of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson. He didn’t go through the NFA hurdles to get it, yet he had it.

In other words, as we’ve said repeatedly, all the law does is keep law-abiding people from going through the hassle of having something that is, ultimately, a safety device.

The hysteria on display is downright hysterical.

Read the full article here

You Might Also Like

In Surprise Twist, Hawaii Lawmakers Reject Semi-Auto Ban

Woman dies from gunshot to the head a week after being arrested for allegedly locking up teen in chicken coop for months

Will Trump’s ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs restore American manufacturing?

‘ChatGPT saved my life,’ says mom who survived cancer after doctors missed it

NFL trade: 49ers sending star receiver Deebo Samuel to Commanders: report

Share This Article
Facebook X Email Print
Previous Article Rand Paul: Trump’s Riyadh speech is historic, but Qatar’s 0M jet is trouble Rand Paul: Trump’s Riyadh speech is historic, but Qatar’s $400M jet is trouble
Next Article Elite University Withholds Student’s Diploma After He Went Rogue During Grad Speech, Ranted About Palestine Elite University Withholds Student’s Diploma After He Went Rogue During Grad Speech, Ranted About Palestine
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

- Advertisement -
Ad image

Latest News

Bullets and Bones: Archaeological View of the Battle of the Little Bighorn (ASAC Presentation)
Bullets and Bones: Archaeological View of the Battle of the Little Bighorn (ASAC Presentation)
Guns
Trump Accuses Democrats of Leaking Intelligence on Iran Strike; FBI Launches Investigation [WATCH]
Trump Accuses Democrats of Leaking Intelligence on Iran Strike; FBI Launches Investigation [WATCH]
Politics
ICE Rescuing Trafficked Children
ICE Rescuing Trafficked Children
Politics
Elite University Withholds Student’s Diploma After He Went Rogue During Grad Speech, Ranted About Palestine
‘One-Stop Shop’: Ron DeSantis Shows Off New Alligator-Friendly Facility For Illegals
Politics
After ‘Byrd Bath’, Republicans Look to Plan B On Suppressors, Short-Barrel Firearms
After ‘Byrd Bath’, Republicans Look to Plan B On Suppressors, Short-Barrel Firearms
News
S&P 500 hits new record high following months of Trump tariff doom and gloom
S&P 500 hits new record high following months of Trump tariff doom and gloom
News
© 2025 Concealed Republican. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Press Release
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?