By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Concealed RepublicanConcealed Republican
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
Reading: Federal appeals judge blocks Trump’s plan to end birthright citizenship in US
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Concealed RepublicanConcealed Republican
  • News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Concealed Republican > Blog > News > Federal appeals judge blocks Trump’s plan to end birthright citizenship in US
News

Federal appeals judge blocks Trump’s plan to end birthright citizenship in US

Jim Taft
Last updated: July 26, 2025 12:12 am
By Jim Taft 3 Min Read
Share
Federal appeals judge blocks Trump’s plan to end birthright citizenship in US
SHARE

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A federal appeals judge on Friday blocked President Donald Trump’s plan to end birthright citizenship for the children of people in the country illegally or temporarily. 

U.S. District Judge Leo Sorokin ruled that a nationwide injunction on the Trump administration’s effort to end birthright citizenship that he issued earlier this year and that was granted to more than a dozen states can stand. 

Sorokin said the ruling was an exception to a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling that limited lower courts’ ability to issue nationwide injunctions. The issue is expected to return to the Supreme Court.  

FEDERAL JUDGE BLOCKS TRUMP’S BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP BAN FOR ALL INFANTS, TESTING LOWER COURT POWERS

Trump and the administration “are entitled to pursue their interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment, and no doubt the Supreme Court will ultimately settle the question,” Sorokin wrote in his ruling. “But in the meantime, for purposes of this lawsuit at this juncture, the Executive Order is unconstitutional.”

The Trump administration has argued that children born in the U.S. to parents in the country illegally and temporarily are not “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States and therefore not entitled to citizenship. 

Trump signed the birthright citizenship executive order, along with a slew of other orders, on his first day in office in January. 

UPENDING US BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP WOULD HAVE DRASTIC NEGATIVE IMPACT, DEFENDERS WARN

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a press conference in the James S. Brady Briefing Room at the White House, on June 27, 2025, in Washington D.C., following a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that limits the application of birthright citizenship. (Mehmet Eser / Middle East Images via AFP / Getty)

On Wednesday, the San Francisco-based 9th Circuit Court of Appeals also affirmed the lower court’s nationwide injunction, and, earlier this month, a New Hampshire federal judge issued a ruling prohibiting Trump’s executive order from taking effect nationwide in a new class-action lawsuit.

Sorokin disagreed with the Trump administration’s argument that the Supreme Court’s ruling warranted a narrower ruling. 

A woman is pictured protesting outside the U.S. Supreme Court building with her infant.

The plaintiffs in the class-action lawsuit argued that Trump’s executive order is unconstitutional because the 14th Amendment guarantees birthright citizenship, and it also threatens millions of dollars in state funding for “essential” health insurance services contingent on citizenship status. 

Reuters and the Associated Press contributed to this report. 

Read the full article here

You Might Also Like

Third Circuit Suggests Gun Ban for Drug Users Not Always Constitutional

MN Lawmakers: Women Need to be Trained Before Defending Themselves from Abusive Partner

Trans ideology’s newest victim | Blaze Media

Illinois Tries to Re-Define ‘Sensitive Places’ In Defense of ‘Gun-Free Zone’

Taylor Swift clears the air on those Super Bowl halftime show rumors

Share This Article
Facebook X Email Print
Previous Article Powers and O’Reilly Debate Gun Control’s Impact on Women Powers and O’Reilly Debate Gun Control’s Impact on Women
Next Article House Ethics Committee nails Ocasio-Cortez over Met Gala controversy House Ethics Committee nails Ocasio-Cortez over Met Gala controversy
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

- Advertisement -
Ad image

Latest News

Sen. Warren Launches “Investigation” Into Privately Funded Trump Ballroom, Gets Roasted Online
Sen. Warren Launches “Investigation” Into Privately Funded Trump Ballroom, Gets Roasted Online
Politics
To Lower Health Costs, Legalize Catastrophic Health Insurance Plans for All
To Lower Health Costs, Legalize Catastrophic Health Insurance Plans for All
Politics
Living through the screen: Black Rifle Coffee co-founder warns smartphones are destroying minds and memories
Living through the screen: Black Rifle Coffee co-founder warns smartphones are destroying minds and memories
News
Early voting begins in New York and New Jersey for mayor, governor races
Early voting begins in New York and New Jersey for mayor, governor races
News
The .280 Remington Should Have Been a Success. Here’s Why It Wasn’t
The .280 Remington Should Have Been a Success. Here’s Why It Wasn’t
Guns
Coast Guard Security Opens Fire on Suspect Trying to Ram Gate with a U-Haul Truck [WATCH]
Coast Guard Security Opens Fire on Suspect Trying to Ram Gate with a U-Haul Truck [WATCH]
Politics
© 2025 Concealed Republican. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Press Release
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?