By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Concealed RepublicanConcealed Republican
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
Reading: Federal Judge Upholds Rhode Island’s ‘May Issue’ Open Carry Permits
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Concealed RepublicanConcealed Republican
  • News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Concealed Republican > Blog > News > Federal Judge Upholds Rhode Island’s ‘May Issue’ Open Carry Permits
News

Federal Judge Upholds Rhode Island’s ‘May Issue’ Open Carry Permits

Jim Taft
Last updated: August 5, 2025 3:41 pm
By Jim Taft 5 Min Read
Share
Federal Judge Upholds Rhode Island’s ‘May Issue’ Open Carry Permits
SHARE

There are only three states in the U.S that have an outright ban on openly carrying firearms; California, Illinois, and (oddly enough) Florida. Sixteen others require a permit to openly carry, though in most states a concealed carry license also covers openly carried firearms. 





Rhode Island issues concealed carry-only permits through local licensing authorities, but anyone wanting to bear arms openly must apply for an “unrestricted” carry permit through the state Attorney General’s office, and applicants must show a “need” to open carry in order to obtain their Second Amendment permission slip. 

That flies in the face of what the Supreme Court held in Bruen: proper-cause requirements violate the Fourteenth Amendment by preventing law-abiding citizens with ordinary self-defense needs from exercising their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms in public for self-defense.

Despite that plain language, a federal judge has upheld Rhode Island’s “may issue” scheme by declaring that so long as the state has a “shall issue” permitting system for concealed carry it can impose whatever restrictions it wants on openly carried arms. 

“Plaintiffs’ argument to the contrary is foreclosed by Bruen itself,” the judge ruled. “There, the Supreme Court concluded that ‘[t]he historical evidence from antebellum America does not demonstrate that the manner of public carry was subject to reasonable regulation.’”

Additionally, Smith found that the attorney general’s “application of the act’s permitting structure to plaintiffs is relevantly similar to historical regulations, and thus consistent with the Second Amendment.”





Quoting further from the opinion:

W]hile Bruen held that the Second Amendment’s plain text protects “carrying handguns publicly for self-defense,” it did not go so far as to declare that the text requires open carry. 

But the Court need not dive too deeply into this question because, even assuming the text covers open carry, Defendants’ application of the Firearms Act to regulate Plaintiffs’ manner of public carry is within the Nation’s historical tradition of regulation…. [In Bruen], the Supreme Court concluded that “[t]he historical evidence from antebellum America does demonstrate that the manner of public carry was subject to reasonable regulation.” And it drew that conclusion, in part, from its finding that historically, “States could lawfully eliminate one kind of public carry—concealed carry—so long as they left open the option to carry openly.” The Firearms Act, through its permitting structure, does just this, albeit in reverse: it regulates Plaintiffs’ manner of public carry in that it limits their right to open carry but leaves unaffected their right to concealed carry.

That statement by the Supreme Court makes it extraordinarily difficult to challenge both open carry bans like the ones in Florida, Illinois, and California as well as “may issue” laws in states like Rhode Island. 





It also opens the door for anti-gun lawmakers to play games with our Second Amendment rights. What would happen if a state like California decided to allow open carry with a permit but ban concealed firearms? Some people would adapt, but my guess is that the number of folks exercising their right to bear arms would plummet, given that most of us carrying for self-defense don’t want to advertise that fact. 

I don’t know how likely it is for anti-gun Democrats in blue states to take that extreme step, but under Judge William Smith’s reasoning it would be perfectly acceptable and constitutional, even if had a chilling effect on the number of people exercising their right to bear arms. The Supreme Court needs to issue a correction at the first opportunity to make it clear that “may issue” laws are unconstitutional in every circumstance, even when the exist alongside a “shall issue” system for one form of carry. 


Editor’s Note: Activist judges are doing everything they can to hamstring our Second Amendment rights.

Help us hold these judges accountable for their unconstitutional rulings. Join Bearing Arms VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.



Read the full article here

You Might Also Like

The era of muzzled pastors is OVER: Why your church may get political soon

New pope, old problem: Will Leo XIV resist tyranny?

NYT columnist Brooks compares Musk to history’s mass murderers over USAID cuts

New biography challenges long-standing rumors of JFK-Marilyn Monroe affair

Nevada Considers Slew of Gun Control Regulations That Will Only Hurt

Share This Article
Facebook X Email Print
Previous Article Alex Stein causes mass meltdown of transgender activists Alex Stein causes mass meltdown of transgender activists
Next Article Rachel Maddow Delivers Discombobulated ‘Dictatorship’ Diatribe For Half Her Weekly Show Rachel Maddow Delivers Discombobulated ‘Dictatorship’ Diatribe For Half Her Weekly Show
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

- Advertisement -
Ad image

Latest News

Idaho River Search For Floating ‘Deceased Female’ Ends With Shocking Twist After Hours of Panic [WATCH]
Idaho River Search For Floating ‘Deceased Female’ Ends With Shocking Twist After Hours of Panic [WATCH]
Politics
Congresswoman: ‘I Am a Proud Guatemalan’
Congresswoman: ‘I Am a Proud Guatemalan’
Politics
Rachel Maddow Delivers Discombobulated ‘Dictatorship’ Diatribe For Half Her Weekly Show
Most Voters Want Accountability For Russiagate, New Rasmussen Poll Shows
Politics
GOA Launches Hispanic Coalition for Gun Rights
GOA Launches Hispanic Coalition for Gun Rights
News
Cincinnati mob attack suspect accused of punching woman in face, apparently knocking her out, is arrested
Cincinnati mob attack suspect accused of punching woman in face, apparently knocking her out, is arrested
News
WWE news: Becky Lynch pokes fun at Nikki Bella and John Cena breakup
WWE news: Becky Lynch pokes fun at Nikki Bella and John Cena breakup
News
© 2025 Concealed Republican. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Press Release
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?