By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Concealed RepublicanConcealed Republican
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
Reading: Supreme Court rules against Trump on deportations under Alien Enemies Act; Alito and Thomas dissent
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Concealed RepublicanConcealed Republican
  • News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Concealed Republican > Blog > News > Supreme Court rules against Trump on deportations under Alien Enemies Act; Alito and Thomas dissent
News

Supreme Court rules against Trump on deportations under Alien Enemies Act; Alito and Thomas dissent

Jim Taft
Last updated: May 17, 2025 2:37 am
By Jim Taft 10 Min Read
Share
Supreme Court rules against Trump on deportations under Alien Enemies Act; Alito and Thomas dissent
SHARE

The U.S. Supreme Court granted a temporary motion on Friday to pause deportations under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 based on the lack of due process given to migrants.

The 7-2 ruling was issued unsigned, but Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas publicly dissented from the majority.

Alito dissented on the basis that the court had ‘no authority to issue any relief’ so early in the litigation process.

The lawsuit was filed by a group of Venezuelans from North Texas who were accused by the government of being gang members and thereby eligible for deportation without due process.

The court rejected a motion from the Trump administration to allow them to continue the deportation proceedings, and ruled that the government had not given the migrants the due process to challenge the deportations.

The ruling cited the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, where the administration said they had no power to return the man, despite admitting that his deportation was due to a clerical error.

The Supreme Court said that “the detainees’ interests at stake are accordingly particularly weighty,” given that the Trump administration had been “unable to provide for the return of an individual deported in error to a prison in El Salvador.”

Alito dissented on the basis that the court had “no authority to issue any relief” so early in the litigation process.

Lawyers for the American Civil Liberties Union argue that the detained migrants were not notified by the government in a language that they understand and were not notified of their rights, nor given enough time to exercise their rights.

The Supreme Court had unanimously ruled in April that migrants needed to be allowed due process to challenge deportation proceedings.

RELATED: Trump lashes out at Supreme Court for blocking deportations

Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images

Defenders of the use of the 1798 law say that the scale of the millions of deportations needed to alleviate the immigration crisis is so great that due process cannot be granted to each migrant to be deported. Critics of the administration say due process is necessary to protect against mistaken deportations, as well as to allow suspects to challenge the designation and prove their innocence.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!



Read the full article here

You Might Also Like

Gun Owners Need to Speak Up to Turn This Permitless Carry Bill Into Law

Rosie O’Donnell leaves US after Trump win

NFL legend Eddie George set to become Bowling Green’s next head coach, reports

Chip and Joanna Gaines take dance lessons to revitalize 22-year marriage

Tulsi Gabbard revokes classified info access for Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton, Liz Cheney, and others

Share This Article
Facebook X Email Print
Previous Article Biden admits keeping classified Afghanistan document for posterity in leaked audio Biden admits keeping classified Afghanistan document for posterity in leaked audio
Next Article Trump’s ‘One, Big Beautiful Bill’ Suffers Early Setback After Conservative Backlash Trump’s ‘One, Big Beautiful Bill’ Suffers Early Setback After Conservative Backlash
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

- Advertisement -
Ad image

Latest News

Jerome Powell Disputes Trump’s Claim Before Donald Pulls Out the Receipts [WATCH]
Jerome Powell Disputes Trump’s Claim Before Donald Pulls Out the Receipts [WATCH]
Politics
More details from terrifying Alabama bunker child rape case: Shock collars, torture, and possible tie to Mexican gang
More details from terrifying Alabama bunker child rape case: Shock collars, torture, and possible tie to Mexican gang
News
US-Mexico deal to resolve Tijuana River sewage crisis announced by EPA
US-Mexico deal to resolve Tijuana River sewage crisis announced by EPA
News
Shapiro Rips NYC Mayoral Nominee Zohran Mamdani for Not Condemning Antisemitism
Shapiro Rips NYC Mayoral Nominee Zohran Mamdani for Not Condemning Antisemitism
Politics
Trump’s ‘One, Big Beautiful Bill’ Suffers Early Setback After Conservative Backlash
Police Release Surveillance Video Showing Shirtless Man Allegedly Trying To Enter Lawmaker’s Home
Politics
Planned Parenthood’s ugly truth finally has consequences
Planned Parenthood’s ugly truth finally has consequences
News
© 2025 Concealed Republican. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Press Release
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?