By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Concealed RepublicanConcealed Republican
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
Reading: Supreme Court rules against Trump on deportations under Alien Enemies Act; Alito and Thomas dissent
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Concealed RepublicanConcealed Republican
  • News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Concealed Republican > Blog > News > Supreme Court rules against Trump on deportations under Alien Enemies Act; Alito and Thomas dissent
News

Supreme Court rules against Trump on deportations under Alien Enemies Act; Alito and Thomas dissent

Jim Taft
Last updated: May 17, 2025 2:37 am
By Jim Taft 10 Min Read
Share
Supreme Court rules against Trump on deportations under Alien Enemies Act; Alito and Thomas dissent
SHARE

The U.S. Supreme Court granted a temporary motion on Friday to pause deportations under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 based on the lack of due process given to migrants.

The 7-2 ruling was issued unsigned, but Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas publicly dissented from the majority.

Alito dissented on the basis that the court had ‘no authority to issue any relief’ so early in the litigation process.

The lawsuit was filed by a group of Venezuelans from North Texas who were accused by the government of being gang members and thereby eligible for deportation without due process.

The court rejected a motion from the Trump administration to allow them to continue the deportation proceedings, and ruled that the government had not given the migrants the due process to challenge the deportations.

The ruling cited the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, where the administration said they had no power to return the man, despite admitting that his deportation was due to a clerical error.

The Supreme Court said that “the detainees’ interests at stake are accordingly particularly weighty,” given that the Trump administration had been “unable to provide for the return of an individual deported in error to a prison in El Salvador.”

Alito dissented on the basis that the court had “no authority to issue any relief” so early in the litigation process.

Lawyers for the American Civil Liberties Union argue that the detained migrants were not notified by the government in a language that they understand and were not notified of their rights, nor given enough time to exercise their rights.

The Supreme Court had unanimously ruled in April that migrants needed to be allowed due process to challenge deportation proceedings.

RELATED: Trump lashes out at Supreme Court for blocking deportations

Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images

Defenders of the use of the 1798 law say that the scale of the millions of deportations needed to alleviate the immigration crisis is so great that due process cannot be granted to each migrant to be deported. Critics of the administration say due process is necessary to protect against mistaken deportations, as well as to allow suspects to challenge the designation and prove their innocence.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!



Read the full article here

You Might Also Like

FSU shooting: Famed sports alumni speak out after deadly shooting

Austin Metcalf’s death sparks outrage — and opportunism

NFL news: Colts’ Braden Smith talks mental health battles during 2024 season

Christ is king: Why the globalist agenda is doomed to fail

Is Self-Defense a Right, or Something More?

Share This Article
Facebook X Email Print
Previous Article Biden admits keeping classified Afghanistan document for posterity in leaked audio Biden admits keeping classified Afghanistan document for posterity in leaked audio
Next Article Trump’s ‘One, Big Beautiful Bill’ Suffers Early Setback After Conservative Backlash Trump’s ‘One, Big Beautiful Bill’ Suffers Early Setback After Conservative Backlash
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

- Advertisement -
Ad image

Latest News

Trump’s ‘One, Big Beautiful Bill’ Suffers Early Setback After Conservative Backlash
Inside The New Group Remaking The Trump-Rubio State Department
Politics
Sex-changing frogs and infertile humans: Will MAHA target infamous herbicide contaminating America’s water?
Sex-changing frogs and infertile humans: Will MAHA target infamous herbicide contaminating America’s water?
News
Actress Natasha Lyonne pushing for AI regulations, lobbying Trump admin
Actress Natasha Lyonne pushing for AI regulations, lobbying Trump admin
News
Trump Pushes “Final Proposal” for Gaza Cease-Fire, Hamas on the Clock
Trump Pushes “Final Proposal” for Gaza Cease-Fire, Hamas on the Clock
Politics
Trump’s ‘One, Big Beautiful Bill’ Suffers Early Setback After Conservative Backlash
Media Said Trump Couldn’t Get BBB Passed By July 4. They Were Dead Wrong
Politics
4th of July staples like hot dogs cost less under Trump
4th of July staples like hot dogs cost less under Trump
News
© 2025 Concealed Republican. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Press Release
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?