By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Concealed RepublicanConcealed Republican
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
Reading: The impending AI-driven jobless economy: Who will pay taxes?
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Concealed RepublicanConcealed Republican
  • News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Concealed Republican > Blog > News > The impending AI-driven jobless economy: Who will pay taxes?
News

The impending AI-driven jobless economy: Who will pay taxes?

Jim Taft
Last updated: February 13, 2025 9:01 am
By Jim Taft 9 Min Read
Share
The impending AI-driven jobless economy: Who will pay taxes?
SHARE

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Our socioeconomic system is facing an existential threat from AI. In our capitalist society, most people depend on jobs to sustain themselves. The U.S. government, in turn, relies heavily on taxing the income of individual workers for revenue.

As artificial intelligence progressively eliminates job opportunities, a growing number of individuals will face severe job insecurity, leading to a corresponding decline in federal revenue. Radical action is needed now to steer away from a dystopian collapse toward better possibilities. 

Specifically, income-based taxes must be replaced with some other form of taxation, and the support mechanisms for the unemployed must be adapted to support a large population that will have been pushed out of the job market. Given that the use of AI in place of human workers is the cause of the problem, it makes sense that the commercial use of AI systems should be taxed to compensate Americans for lost wages and the federal government for the loss of income-based taxes. 

The motivation for these concerns is that AI capabilities are advancing rapidly, and while most jobs are currently safe, it is becoming clear that AI will eventually perform nearly any task more efficiently and cheaply than people can. From manufacturing to customer service and even creative fields like writing or music, machines are already showing that they can outperform humans. 

AI CAN’T WAIT: WHY WE NEED SPEED TO WIN

The wide range of robots under development will extend AI’s reach to include physical jobs, such as construction, healthcare and house cleaning. Although this transition won’t occur overnight, it is inevitable. Companies will continue replacing human workers with AI-driven systems because it saves money and boosts productivity. The question isn’t if AI will take over most jobs, it’s when.

A future where robots do all the work could be great if we plan now for the societal implications of widespread unemployment. The obvious problem is that without jobs, people will have no way to pay for food, housing or anything else. The slightly less obvious problem is that the revenue collected by the U.S. government is currently based on taxing working humans. 

Adding up payroll, income, Social Security and Medicare taxes together accounts for more than 80% of federal revenue. As unemployment grows, the tax base will diminish, resulting in a substantial decline in government revenue. Our economy will face a double whammy of falling revenue while at the same time growing numbers of people who genuinely and through no fault of their own need support.

AI IS RESHAPING BUSINESS. THIS IS HOW WE STAY AHEAD OF CHINA

Traditionally, the issue of supporting non-workers, for example, through Welfare or Universal Basic Income (UBI), has been objectionable to many because it fundamentally involves taxing the production of workers to support those who don’t work. That type of wealth reallocation evokes alienating comparisons to socialism or communism. Even if we were willing to accept the idea of taxing workers and using the money to support others, that requires a large pool of workers to tax, which we won’t have because AI will have taken their jobs. 

However, with AI replacing human workers, we have an alternative method for funding support mechanisms like UBI. What we need to do is figure out a reasonable way to tax the work done by AI and distribute the proceeds rationally to human beings.

This proposal is very different from socialism or communism in that we aren’t taking the fruits of one person’s work and giving them to someone else. Instead, we would be taking the proceeds of AI/robot effort and sharing them out to humans.

HOW TEAM TRUMP CAN MAKE AI STAND FOR AMERICAN INNOVATION

Given that AI systems have been trained on vast amounts of the public’s data, there is even a compelling economic justification for taxing these AI systems and sending money back to the public. Think of it as a license fee paid to American citizens for using their data. 

Of course, many Americans also object to taxing businesses. From Amazon to mom-and-pop groceries, the concern is that taxes would be burdensome and harmful to the business. 

However, these companies will see huge savings from replacing workers that might cost $30K to $300K per year in salary with robots that could easily cost less than $30K and have annual maintenance and power costs well under $20K per year. The savings for non-physical jobs will be even larger as those won’t require a physical robot, just an AI running in the cloud. 

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

As an added bonus, these AI workers operate 24/7 without needing rest. (Note that the power bill would not be prohibitively expensive. Training a large AI can be costly, but once trained it can be replicated many times with each copy able to run on a high-end personal computer using less than $10 of electricity per day.)

When an AI-driven robot makes something, a sandwich or a car, it creates new value: the difference between the raw materials and the final product. Similar value is also created if the robot mines gold or harvests lumber. If a human did the work, then that value would be split three ways: employer, human employee, government. However, when a robot does the work, there is no human employee in the split. 

In essence, I’m suggesting that we find a way to put humans back into that equation. The way that seems most obvious to me is that the AI work should be taxed and the proceeds used to support American citizens through UBI, or something similar. 

Admittedly, it’s unclear how we should actually measure “AI work” in a reasonable way, but even if that were a fatal flaw in this proposal, the motivating problem of AI taking over most jobs is still looming ahead. Whether it’s taxing AI work or something else, we need to come up with some plan and start implementing it now. 

We could have a bright future where people could live their lives comfortably, focused on their own passions instead of working for others. Or, if you want to see the alternative, go watch The Hunger Games.

JAMES O’BRIEN

Disclaimer: Any opinions expressed in this article are only those of the author as a private individual. Nothing in this article should be interpreted as a statement made in relation to the author’s professional position with any institution.

Read the full article here

You Might Also Like

FBI concluded Dem operative lied to Congress about her role in Crossfire Hurricane scheme, declassified records show

GOP senator claps back at Trump tariff cost projections: ‘Uncharted waters’

Nicole Kidman says health struggle left her ‘terrified’ after giving birth

Navy Seal who killd Bin Laden was stressed about NFL Draft before mission

Kansas City Star Gets It Half-Right on Super Bowl Celebrations

Share This Article
Facebook X Email Print
Previous Article Cop Breaks Down Viral Video Of Female Cop Shooting Armed Citizen With His Own Gun Cop Breaks Down Viral Video Of Female Cop Shooting Armed Citizen With His Own Gun
Next Article Melania Trump reopens White House public tours — here’s how you can request a visit Melania Trump reopens White House public tours — here’s how you can request a visit
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

- Advertisement -
Ad image

Latest News

Joy Behar Tanks Democrat Strategy, Calls Men Sexist After Millions Spent [WATCH]
Joy Behar Tanks Democrat Strategy, Calls Men Sexist After Millions Spent [WATCH]
Politics
Too Orwellian To Check: ‘1984’ Gets a Trigger Warning
Too Orwellian To Check: ‘1984’ Gets a Trigger Warning
Politics
‘Silly Season’: GOP Senator Now Trailing Opponent In Poll By Over 20 Points, Though Race Far From Over
‘Silly Season’: GOP Senator Now Trailing Opponent In Poll By Over 20 Points, Though Race Far From Over
Politics
New ‘Brady Permit Chart’ Tells Interesting Story About Anti-Gun States
New ‘Brady Permit Chart’ Tells Interesting Story About Anti-Gun States
News
Riley Gaines slaps down Jemele Hill after leaked report says Olympic women’s boxing champ has male chromosomes
Riley Gaines slaps down Jemele Hill after leaked report says Olympic women’s boxing champ has male chromosomes
News
Baraka v. Habba: Fox News Politics Newsletter for June 3, 2025
Baraka v. Habba: Fox News Politics Newsletter for June 3, 2025
News
© 2025 Concealed Republican. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Press Release
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?