By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Concealed RepublicanConcealed Republican
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
Reading: Three State AGs Want to Defend Federal Ban on Shipping Guns Through Post Office
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Concealed RepublicanConcealed Republican
  • News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Concealed Republican > Blog > News > Three State AGs Want to Defend Federal Ban on Shipping Guns Through Post Office
News

Three State AGs Want to Defend Federal Ban on Shipping Guns Through Post Office

Jim Taft
Last updated: March 10, 2026 4:33 pm
By Jim Taft 6 Min Read
Share
Three State AGs Want to Defend Federal Ban on Shipping Guns Through Post Office
SHARE

If you wanted to ship a gun somewhere, you had to send it through a private carrier. The United States Postal Service was off the menu, and that was just the way the law worked. Only, those private carriers wouldn’t let regular folks ship guns through them, which left the postal service, and since that was off the table, your options of shipping a firearm lawfully were nil, which sure feels like a violation of the Second Amendment.





And, in time, the Department of Justice agreed and opted to stop defending the law in a legal challenge. As of today, you can ship a gun via the USPS if that’s what makes the most sense for you.

However, some of the usual suspects have a problem with that, apparently, and they want to step in and defend the law since the DOJ won’t.

Three states say they will stand up for gun-control laws that the Trump administration will no longer defend and fight the shipment of firearms through the mail.

The attorneys general of New York, New Jersey and Delaware want to intervene in a Pennsylvania federal court case that challenges the prohibition of mailing guns through the U.S. Postal Service. The AGs said in a Monday brief that their involvement is needed because the federal government will no longer defend the law.

Allowing citizens to transport firearms through the mail would impair states from enforcing their own safety laws, they say.

“Those interests are no longer represented by the Federal Defendants, which no longer offers any defense of this critical public safety law on the merits, based on their unprecedented determination that this longstanding federal statute is unconstitutional, at least in certain applications,” their motion says.

Bonita Shreve and Gun Owners of America sued the U.S. Postal Service July 14 in Johnstown. Shreve, of Blair County, has no intention of making the three-hour drive to her father in Eastern Pennsylvania to deliver a handgun.

Because she does not hold a Federal Firearms License, Shreve can’t send the gun through a private service like UPS, leaving the Post Office as her last option. But a 1927 law says she can’t, so nearly 100 years later its constitutionality is challenged in her lawsuit.

There are exceptions to the law for members of the military, but Shreve and her father don’t qualify. Co-plaintiff Gun Owners of America says it has more than 2 million members and supporters, some of whom would also wish to use the Post Office to ship guns.





And the truth is that a lot of times, shipping a gun has to be done.

If you want custom work done from a particular gunsmith who doesn’t live in driving distance, you’ve got to put it in a box and send it. As it stands, you’ve got to get your FFL to handle the shipping, which is ridiculous.

And for what?

The last time I looked, criminals in New York City, Trenton, or Philadelphia weren’t exactly hurting for access to firearms. They seem to have no issue getting them from various sources, even with the prohibitions, so why are we causing problems for law-abiding citizens, creating no avenue for the lawful shipment of firearms at all, when the status quo accomplishes nothing?

Even if it did, I’d oppose it on Second Amendment principles, but a lot of people don’t share those, so again, I ask, why do something that’s proven not to work?

The law in question dates back to Prohibition, and it was intended to stop the mob from sending guns all over the place. The fact that they were shipping liquor hither and yon apparently didn’t strike anyone as relevant when they drafted this, apparently, and now the law is even more ridiculous.

If these states are allowed to step in, it shouldn’t do anything except make the current status official as I sincerely doubt the Supreme Court is going to actually side with these three AGs on this one.







Editor’s Note: The radical left will stop at nothing to enact their radical gun control agenda and strip us of our Second Amendment rights.

Help us continue to report on and expose the Democrats’ gun control policies and schemes. Join Bearing Arms VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership.



Read the full article here

You Might Also Like

NFL news: Titans nearing deal to make Robert Saleh head coach

Owners of ABC affiliates expect an apology from Jimmy Kimmel

Speaker Mike Johnson demands Democrats follow ‘common sense’ amid shutdown threat

How Hillary Clinton turned empathy into a political cudgel

Angel dad rebukes Democrats for staying seated during State of Union

Share This Article
Facebook X Email Print
Previous Article ‘Prioritize Americans’: SBA shuts door on foreign national borrowers ‘Prioritize Americans’: SBA shuts door on foreign national borrowers
Next Article Trump Holds Key Endorsement Hostage To Hold Republicans’ Feet To Fire Trump Holds Key Endorsement Hostage To Hold Republicans’ Feet To Fire
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

- Advertisement -
Ad image

Latest News

Vance Attends Dignified Transfer for Kentucky Soldier Killed in Iran Conflict [WATCH]
Vance Attends Dignified Transfer for Kentucky Soldier Killed in Iran Conflict [WATCH]
Politics
NY Times: San Francisco’s BART System Faces a Doom Loop
NY Times: San Francisco’s BART System Faces a Doom Loop
Politics
Trump Holds Key Endorsement Hostage To Hold Republicans’ Feet To Fire
TSA Calls To End Now 25 Day ‘Democrat Shutdown’ With Airport Lines Out The Door, Terror Threats Abounding
Politics
Connecticut Arrest Shatters Tons of Gun Control Myths
Connecticut Arrest Shatters Tons of Gun Control Myths
News
Thug shoves 83-year-old man from behind onto NYC subway tracks in reportedly random attack
Thug shoves 83-year-old man from behind onto NYC subway tracks in reportedly random attack
News
ICE Houston nabs hundreds of child sex offenders during Trump’s first year back
ICE Houston nabs hundreds of child sex offenders during Trump’s first year back
News
© 2025 Concealed Republican. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Press Release
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?