Joe Biden has been diagnosed with stage four prostate cancer that has metastasized to his bones, according to a recent statement from his medical team.
The announcement has reignited scrutiny over the transparency of the Biden White House, with questions swirling about how such an advanced illness went undetected — or unreported — during his presidency.
The diagnosis, described as “a more aggressive form” of prostate cancer with a Gleason score of 9 (Grade Group 5), was disclosed publicly only after Biden had left office.
Trump’s Sovereign Wealth Fund: What Could It Mean For Your Money?
The disease’s advanced stage has led to questions from medical professionals and political observers alike, particularly regarding the apparent absence of regular prostate screenings during Biden’s term in office.
According to the statement released to outlets including CBS News and CNN, Biden’s cancer was discovered only recently following increased urinary symptoms.
The report noted that the cancer is “hormone-sensitive,” which allows for treatment options, but did not clarify how long the disease had been developing or whether any prior testing had taken place while Biden served as president.
CBS News cited sources close to Biden’s medical team suggesting that routine screenings were not performed during his time in office, allegedly due to his age and in part to “reduce unnecessary procedures.”
CBS medical contributor says the White House stopped testing for prostate cancer in Biden because he was “too old”
LOL!! The gaslighting is real!
pic.twitter.com/AAuqv2bcvM— Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman) May 20, 2025
This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year
One source even pointed to cost-related concerns as a reason for deferring prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing — a claim that has raised eyebrows given the significant health resources typically devoted to presidents.
CBS News suggests Biden was not getting PSA tests for cancer screening as President of the United States to save money. pic.twitter.com/mafcl1l7SK
— Big Fish (@BigFish3000) May 20, 2025
A review of past presidential health practices shows that former Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama received regular PSA screenings during their time in office.
Biden, by contrast, had not reportedly undergone a PSA test since 2014, before his term began.
The lack of routine testing while serving as commander in chief has fueled bipartisan concern, with critics pointing to a broader lack of medical transparency throughout his administration.
Medical experts note that annual prostate screenings are generally recommended for men in their 70s and 80s, especially when accompanied by urinary issues.
That Biden reached a diagnosis only after the cancer had spread to his bones has prompted speculation that the cancer may have been developing during his presidency.
Urologist says it typically takes 5-10 YEARS for Biden’s prostate cancer to spread to level announced today. This would mean Biden could have run for president knowing he had cancer back in 2020. Dementia and cancer for Joe. So who ran the country? pic.twitter.com/nCiMg58uJC
— Clay Travis (@ClayTravis) May 19, 2025
White House officials have yet to provide detailed answers about why Biden was not tested earlier or whether his condition impacted his ability to serve.
The issue comes amid lingering questions about Biden’s cognitive health, which had been the subject of public debate throughout his term.
Former staffers, media analysts, and political commentators have raised concerns about whether key health information was intentionally withheld from the public.
The timing of the diagnosis, revealed shortly after Biden’s departure from office, has further fueled speculation about internal efforts to manage or delay disclosure.
As Biden’s family and medical team explore treatment options, including hormone therapy, pressure is mounting on political leaders and federal agencies to review protocols regarding presidential health transparency.
Calls for an investigation or congressional inquiry into the administration’s handling of Biden’s medical oversight have begun to circulate among lawmakers.
At the heart of the issue is whether the public and government officials were fully informed about the condition of a sitting president facing a serious and potentially debilitating illness.
Biden’s diagnosis has also reignited debate over how age, health, and transparency should factor into presidential eligibility and the responsibility of those close to the president to provide accurate information to the American people.
Connect with Vetted Off-Duty Cops to Instantly Fulfill Your Security Needs
Read the full article here