CNN shockingly calls out Harris for using Trump’s border wall in campaign ad after condemning it for years

In a surprising turn of events, Vice President Kamala Harris has been thrust into the political spotlight once again, this time over her campaign’s recent use of imagery featuring former President Trump’s controversial border wall.

This is the same wall Harris has repeatedly condemned in the past, leading to accusations of hypocrisy from both sides of the political spectrum.

CNN’s “Erin Burnett OutFront” aired a segment Wednesday discussing Harris’ evolving stance on the border wall.

Shotgun Pistol – No FFL Required, Shipped Directly To Your Home

Senior Editor at CNN’s KFile, Andrew Kaczynski, highlighted the apparent contradiction between Harris’ past criticisms and her current campaign ad, which prominently displays a portion of the wall constructed during the Trump administration.

Kaczynski’s report revealed that Harris had, in fact, spoken out against the border wall on at least 50 separate occasions.

Her past remarks included strong language, branding Trump’s wall as “useless” and “un-American.”

Now, Harris’ campaign is using footage of that same wall to appeal to voters, sparking concerns about the consistency of her positions.

In her 2019 book, *The Truths We Hold*, Harris took a firm stance against the border wall, describing it as a “monument standing in opposition to not just everything I value, but to the fundamental values upon which this country was built.”

She argued that the wall symbolized a message of exclusion to the world, effectively telling immigrants, “’KEEP OUT.’”

Additionally, she criticized the project as a “misuse of taxpayer money,” lambasting it as nothing more than a “vanity project” by Trump, who she claimed had “contrived a national crisis around his big distraction.”

Fast forward to the present, and the narrative has shifted. Kaczynski pointed out that the wall featured in Harris’ ad is, in fact, a section built under Trump’s leadership.

“That is a portion of wall that was actually built by Donald Trump.

It was built in an area where there was not previous wall, it was actually pretty controversial when they were building it at the time,” Kaczynski noted during the CNN segment.

This change in tone has left many questioning Harris’ motivations. Burnett echoed these concerns when she asked Kaczynski, “She’s using his wall that he built to say, ‘Look at what I did’?”

The implicit contradiction has raised eyebrows, with some wondering if this is an attempt to appeal to moderates and independents by showcasing a tough stance on immigration.

Others argue it could simply be a strategic move to distance her administration from the chaos and humanitarian concerns that have plagued the U.S.-Mexico border in recent years.

Kaczynski speculated that other sections of the wall featured in Harris’ ad might also have been constructed during Trump’s presidency, based on the “telltale signs” of anti-climbing plates that became widely used during that time.

For Republicans, this development is a prime example of the inconsistency they believe is common among Democrats on immigration policy.

While Harris and other progressive politicians have been vocal in their condemnation of the wall, its practical use in maintaining border security is now being acknowledged, albeit indirectly, through its inclusion in her campaign ads.

Critics from the right are quick to point out what they see as blatant hypocrisy.

Trump’s border wall, once derided as xenophobic and wasteful, is now being touted as a successful component of the current administration’s efforts to secure the border.

On the other hand, some Democrats feel that Harris’ messaging is convoluted, leaving room for her opponents to exploit the discrepancy between her past statements and her present actions.

As Harris continues to walk a tightrope between appeasing her progressive base and addressing the ongoing immigration crisis, the question remains: Can she reconcile her past criticisms of Trump’s border wall with the reality of its inclusion in her own campaign materials?

Only time will tell how this will play out on the national stage, but one thing is certain — the debate surrounding immigration and border security is far from over.

WATCH THE VIDEO: