CNN commentator Van Jones appeared surprised during a recent on-air segment after several Black voters told him they would vote again for President Donald Trump, contradicting long-standing narratives promoted by many Democratic commentators about Trump’s standing with minority voters.
The exchange occurred during a discussion in which Jones posed a direct question to multiple voters about their past and future support for Trump.
The responses challenged assumptions often repeated in political commentary about voter regret or shifting sentiment following the 2016 and 2024 elections.
Warning: Account balances and purchasing power no longer tell the same story. Know in 2 minutes if your retirement is working for you.
Jones asked one voter whether they would support Trump again if given the chance.
“If you had to do it all over again, would you vote for Donald Trump again, yes or no?” Jones asked.
“Yes, I would,” the voter replied. “Now, in the future, I am not a diehard Democrat or diehard Republican. If there were a Democratic candidate who was more aligned for me, then I would vote Democrat.”
Jones then posed the same question to another voter.
This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year
“If you go back in time, would you vote for Donald Trump, yes or no?” he asked.
“Yes,” the voter responded.
Jones reacted to the exchange by acknowledging that he anticipated the answer.
“I think I might know the answer on this,” Jones said.
“She said yes. It’s immediately yes,” the voter added.
A third voter expressed even stronger support when asked the same question.
“1,000% absolutely yes!” the voter said.
The responses appeared to catch Jones off guard, particularly given his history of warning about what he has described as the dangers Trump poses to American society.
The segment highlighted a disconnect between some media narratives and the views expressed by voters participating in the discussion.
Jones has previously acknowledged challenges facing the Democratic Party, including concerns that its messaging may be alienating voters who have traditionally been considered part of its base.
The voters featured in the segment emphasized flexibility in their political preferences, indicating they were willing to support candidates from either party depending on policy alignment rather than party affiliation.
The discussion also reflected ongoing debates within the Democratic Party about the effectiveness of its national messaging strategy.
Analysts have noted that voter concerns about public safety, cost of living, and governance have increasingly influenced electoral outcomes in recent cycles.
While Jones did not dispute the voters’ answers, the segment illustrated how some voters reject characterizations of Trump as uniquely unacceptable, focusing instead on policy outcomes and personal priorities.
The interaction added to a growing body of anecdotal evidence suggesting that voter behavior in recent elections has been shaped more by issue-based considerations than by partisan loyalty alone.
The segment concluded without Jones challenging the voters’ statements, leaving their responses to stand on their own.
As the 2026 and 2028 election cycles approach, such exchanges are likely to receive increased attention as both parties reassess their outreach strategies and assumptions about voter coalitions.
Read the full article here


