By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Concealed RepublicanConcealed Republican
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
Reading: Democrats’ Argument for Aborting Poor People’s Children: Living Children Are Too Expensive
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Concealed RepublicanConcealed Republican
  • News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Concealed Republican > Blog > Politics > Democrats’ Argument for Aborting Poor People’s Children: Living Children Are Too Expensive
Politics

Democrats’ Argument for Aborting Poor People’s Children: Living Children Are Too Expensive

Jim Taft
Last updated: April 4, 2025 10:47 pm
By Jim Taft 4 Min Read
Share
Democrats’ Argument for Aborting Poor People’s Children: Living Children Are Too Expensive
SHARE

Margaret Sanger promoted birth control as the path to eliminating minorities and the disabled to clean up the gene pool. Planned Parenthood, her legacy, jumped on abortion as a means to accomplish this goal. 

That isn’t hyperbole. It is just a fact. Mike Wallace called her a hero. The entire Democratic Party turned her into a saint and has poured tens of billions into Planned Parenthood to accomplish that goal. And now Colorado Democrats are openly justifying their plan to subsidize abortions for the poor because, well, poor kids are expensive to the state. 

2/ Let me break down what’s happening:

– New bill (SB 25-183) to force Medicaid to cover abortions
– Claims it’ll “save” $550K annually
– They’re literally calling dead babies “averted births”

THIS IS NOT A JOKE.https://t.co/ET6TYhtLvh

— Rod D. Martin (@RodDMartin) April 4, 2025

Usually, abortion proponents twist themselves into knots talking about autonomy, preventing “forced births,” female empowerment, and all the rest of the BS they use to justify their bloodthirsty policies. But the fact is that more Black ba

But they appear to be abandoning that gauzy rhetoric and getting down to brass tacks: the poor suck, and we need fewer of them. How are we going to afford high-speed rail and interpretive dances depicting the beauty of gangland violence if we don’t start killing the poor? Kill the babies and euthanize the infirm so funds will be freed up for better things that the AWFLs like. 

4/ 🚨 IMPORTANT CONTEXT: Colorado passed Amendment 79 in 2024 making abortion a “constitutional right”

This new bill is Phase 2: Making YOU pay for it with YOUR tax dollars pic.twitter.com/Avku6sajQi

— Rod D. Martin (@RodDMartin) April 4, 2025

It’s hard to call this line of argument–it’s fiscally sound policy to kill babies before they are born–is driven by anything other than a justification of eugenics using the argument that poor people are expensive, so their numbers should be reduced. And the poor people in question are usually black, so it is hardly a stretch to call this “systemically racist.”

I’m not trying to use a “gotcha” argument here. Blacks and other minorities are more likely to be on Medicaid than whites–that is just a fact–and this bill is intended to reduce the number of Medicaid-eligible babies. 

I’m not sure that “it’s just about the money, not the race” is very convincing. 

With that said, I’m pretty sure that the proponents themselves aren’t thinking mostly in terms of race. Killing black and brown people through abortion is just one of their projects. They also are very much in favor of sterilizing and mutilating white children, who are disproportionately likely to proclaim themselves “trans.” And they seem happy to see white executives killed, too. 

So perhaps this is less about race than just killing off everyone they dislike or find unpleasant. The only group they seem to genuinely like are AWFLs. A few brown people are good to have around to maintain the lawns, clean the houses, and worship them. 

Otherwise, they believe humanity sucks, and Gaia and the AWFLs who should inherit the Earth are better off without more of us. 



Read the full article here

You Might Also Like

Joe Biden Signs 50 Bills On Christmas Eve, Holiday Message Misses The Mark [WATCH]

Trump Reveals What’s Next for Elon Musk’s DOGE, Names Two Big Ones, Trillions Wasted [WATCH]

David Hogg Trashes Democracy As a Political System

HHS’ Civil Rights Office: Maine VIolated Title IX by Allowing Boy to Compete in Girl’s Sports

Telecom Giant Weighs Expanding U.S. Manufacturing in Light of Donald Trump’s Tariffs

Share This Article
Facebook X Email Print
Previous Article Facebook Announces Official End Date For Fact-Checking Program Facebook Announces Official End Date For Fact-Checking Program
Next Article ‘You attack me like that again, I’ll step on your foot’ ‘You attack me like that again, I’ll step on your foot’
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

- Advertisement -
Ad image

Latest News

RFK Calls Abortion Pill Data “Alarming,” Demands FDA “Review and Report Back”
RFK Calls Abortion Pill Data “Alarming,” Demands FDA “Review and Report Back”
Politics
Europeans Big Mad At Trump–Then They Do What He Wants Them To
Europeans Big Mad At Trump–Then They Do What He Wants Them To
Politics
Facebook Announces Official End Date For Fact-Checking Program
Senate GOP Races Ahead With Trump Confirmations Despite Historic Roadblocks From Dems
Politics
Are Biden’s ‘corrupt pardons’ about to collapse in court?!
Are Biden’s ‘corrupt pardons’ about to collapse in court?!
News
Shaquille O’Neal claims Blue Origin’s all-female space flight was staged
Shaquille O’Neal claims Blue Origin’s all-female space flight was staged
News
US Army Ranger Anti War
US Army Ranger Anti War
Videos
© 2025 Concealed Republican. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Press Release
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?