Gavin Newsom Hopes Taxpayers Foot $200 Mil Bill In Frantic Sprint To Gerrymander California For Dems

The California State Legislature is facing a Friday deadline to approve Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom’s proposed November election to gerrymander the state and add up to five additional Democratic House seats — as counties scramble to secure taxpayer funds for the ballot initiative.

Newsom, who announced the measure dubbed the “Election Rigging Response Act” at an Aug. 14 press conference, has on multiple occasions said the state will cover the cost counties will run up. However, California’s counties are expressing concerns they might wind up waiting until after the election for reimbursement from the state. (RELATED: You Won’t Believe How Much Gavin Newsom’s Gerrymandering Gambit Will Cost Taxpayers)

County leaders have discussed pulling taxpayer funding from sheriff’s departments, county jails and wildfire prevention in order to foot the steep bills Newsom’s election will bring, CalMatters reported.

“The additional expenses tied to a statewide special election would fall almost entirely on counties — imposing a significant and unfunded financial burden on already strained local budgets,” the California State Association of Counties wrote in an Aug. 14 letter to the governor and Democratic state legislature leaders.

The California Department of Finance has yet to determine how much money it will offer counties to cover the cost of the election, but a spokesman for the department claimed legislation currently being considered in Sacramento will provide the counties funding in advance, according to CalMatters.

In response to the department’s lack of information, the California Assembly Republican Caucus released its estimate of how much the special election would cost taxpayers, finding the gerrymandering vote could carry a price tag of up to $235.5 million. The GOP caucus based their information off the 2021 California gubernatorial recall election, which cost taxpayers $200 million, but accounted for factors such as inflation, postage and an increase in voter registration in their analysis.

However, because Californians spent months gathering enough signatures to trigger the gubernatorial recall, the state had significantly more time to prepare for the election, and was able to send counties funding ahead of time. Newsom, whose proposed gerrymandered map was released Friday, is still waiting on the state legislature to approve ballot language in time for Election Day in about two and a half months.

“California is running multi-billion-dollar budget deficits year after year, cutting critical services that people rely on, and now Democrats want to blow hundreds of millions on unnecessary Gavinmandering. It’s absurd. The funding for this special election is half-baked,” California Assembly Republican Leader James Gallagher said in a statement to the Daily Caller News Foundation.

“Counties are already being forced to eat the costs. Right now, the money is nothing more than a promise from Gavin Newsom, and if I were a county clerk, I’d be very worried. A Gavin Newsom promise isn’t worth much,” Gallagher added.

Counties face a shortened timeline to not only secure funding, but also machines, ballot paper and envelopes, printers, vendors, voting locations and volunteers. Some counties such as Orange have already begun planning for the election, with its registrar of voters citing concerns that the county’s supplies will not arrive in time if they wait for the state’s official confirmation of the election. The county — the state’s third most populous — is eyeing a $12 million bill for the upcoming election. (‘Hell No’: Why Some Californians Want Zero Part In Newsom’s Gerrymandering Scheme)

Even if the special election proceeds as Newsom plans, it can still end up backfiring on him and the state’s Democratic-dominated legislature. A poll released Aug. 14 showed that only 36% of Californians support the legislature regaining control of the state’s redistricting authority from its current commission.

Newsom announced the “Election Rigging Response Act” in response to Texas’ GOP-controlled legislature drafting a proposed House map that would likely result in Republicans gaining five Democratic-held seats in the Lone Star state. Unlike California, Texas does not require a ballot initiative to greenlight mid-decade redistricting by the state legislature.

Newsom’s office did not respond to the DCNF’s request for comment, and the California Department of Finance could not be reached for comment.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].