Harvard Graduate Education School’s ‘Queer Ed’ Curriculum

Are your kids Queer?

If not, why not? If you don’t know already, it’s because our education system imposes heteronormative cisgender ideology on them, and that must change right away. 

That, my friends, is the position of Harvard’s Graduate School of Education. It is their world, and your kids have to live in it. 

The Harvard course “explores the role of gender and sexuality in shaping young people’s schooling experiences” and “the role of schooling experiences in shaping young people’s notions of gender and sexuality.” pic.twitter.com/sFoK12OSO6

— Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist (@DeAngelisCorey) July 31, 2025

However twisted you believe our educational system–from Pre-K through graduate education–you are underestimating the breadth and depth of the crisis. While most people believe that there has been a benign movement to ensure that gay kids aren’t bullied and that mutual respect is the watchword in our schools, nothing could be further from the truth. Our schools have been turned into Maoist indoctrination centers, and places like Harvard Graduate School of Education are at the forefront of the movement. 

Harvard University’s education school has an initiative called “QueerEd.” pic.twitter.com/00kHCQNPXc

— Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist (@DeAngelisCorey) July 31, 2025

The particular course that Corey DeAngelis is pointing us to is a great example of this phenomenon. Harvard searched out and found a Queer activist to co-teach the course–Kimm Topping–who writes propaganda for Queering kids–to do the work. His/her/its partner in crime is yet another activist-Gretchen Brion-Meisels–whose entire shtick is a “Senior Lecturer on Education” and Faculty Co-Chair, Identity, Power, and Justice in Education Concentration. 

You know what those buzzwords mean, right? 

The course description is exactly what you would expect:

This course explores the role of gender and sexuality in shaping young people’s schooling experiences, opportunities, and outcomes, and the role of schooling experiences in shaping young people’s notions of gender and sexuality. In many ways, the course is about the “hidden curriculum” of heteronormativity and cisnormativity, or the subtle practices in schools that privilege heterosexual, gendered identities and ways of being. As such, students in the course will apply the concept of the hidden curriculum to the study of gender and schooling in order to understand why and how children and youth with different gender identities experience schooling differently and why and how heteronormative schooling detrimentally impacts all students.

By the end of the module, students should be able to: (1) Talk comfortably about queer history and how it can inform our understanding of schools and schooling; (2) identify specific strategies that educators at various levels might use to support students in negotiating gender and sexuality norms; (3) identify tools that schools can use to build positive, nurturing environments, which open up possibilities for complex gender and sexual identity development; and (4) analyze and evaluate a variety of school practices, curricula, programs, and policies that seek to support healthy gender and sexual identity development for U.S. children and adolescents. In order to achieve these goals, the course will begin with some theoretical and historical grounding, move into an exploration of dominant narratives of gender and sexuality today, and then begin to explore where there is possibility for change. 

Harvard, unsurprisingly, prevents anyone who is not enrolled in the course from accessing its actual website, presumably to conceal the actual readings and content. 

If you have the time and want to understand what is going on, Christopher Rufo has a great explanation. It is called “The Long March Through the Institutions,” in which Marxists decided to change tactics. Once they understood that Western society was not vulnerable to armed revolutions, they diverted their attention to taking over cultural institutions first, and using them as a springboard for attaining political power. 

It is a long march for obvious reasons–you have to take over education and mass media first, and use their power to infiltrate government. This is not a conspiracy theory; there is a vast amount of literature written by Marxists to describe this strategy, and the most referenced literature in educational literature is about Antonio Gramsci, the originator of the idea. 

It all sounds conspiracy theory-y, because it is based on a conspiracy. But that conspiracy is out in the open. The Marxists SAY they are going to do something, go do it, and when you point it out you are the nutty one. 

It’s the curse of anti-anti-communism. Political candidates can quote Marx and put out Marxist policies and the media will “debunk” your pointing it out. You are nuts for saying “Zohran Mamdani” wants to abolish private property and seize the means of production. 

It doesn’t matter that he says it. You are the nutty one for pointing it out. 

Gramsci is everywhere, by the way. His ideas permeate medical schools and even the hard sciences. 

Libs: ‘Academic medicine is fine. It’s TOTALLY FINE. Nothing to see here.’

Lancet: ‘Please let us tell you about Antonio Gramsci.’ pic.twitter.com/opoITM1syd

— Coddled Affluent Professional (@feelsdesperate) May 11, 2023

And in our politics:

Look who introduced Gramsci to America?

Joseph Buttigieg, father of Pete Buttigieg! pic.twitter.com/b4tNWNdjL2

— Xi Van Fleet (@XVanFleet) May 6, 2023

We are nearing the final stages in this takeover, and in the fine tradition of America the forces of good have waited until the last minute to gather their strength and fight back. It is always thus in liberal democracies. We tend to be unprepared for wars until they arrive, denying that our enemies are really that bad. 

But, on the other hand, when roused, we fight back hard and usually win. And then go back to complacency. 

If we lose this battle, it is because we let the Trojan Horse into the gates already. The institutions have already been taken over. We are in a gritty hand to hand battle, not a cleaner air war. 

Trump, with all his flaws, is our champion in this battle. It never had to come to this point, but there it is. We are in the fight of our lives for our culture, and we must win. 

The alternative is unthinkable. 

Help us continue to report on President Trump’s successes. Join Hot Air VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.