As scrutiny over Joe Biden’s fitness for office intensified in the latter half of his presidency, new revelations indicate that concerns over his mental decline were not a recent development.
Reports suggest that from the very first day of his administration, White House staffers recognized signs of cognitive struggles and took steps to limit his exposure to the press.
Throughout his time in office, Biden’s public appearances became increasingly controlled, with staff frequently shielding him from unscripted interactions.
Elon Musk Called This Financial News ‘Terrifying’
As his presidency neared its end, voters saw fewer press conferences, more pre-recorded statements, and extended stays at his Delaware beach house or other secluded locations.
Meanwhile, members of the White House Press Corps, who were aware of his condition, largely remained silent, fearing that raising concerns could inadvertently help Republicans or cost them access to the administration.
A recent video compilation highlights how mainstream media outlets repeatedly attempted to downplay Biden’s visible struggles.
The footage, compiled by independent journalist Matt Orfela, showcases how major networks consistently described Biden’s performances as “fiery,” even when his public remarks were marked by confusion, mumbling, and incoherence.
The “fiery” state of the union pic.twitter.com/coaP6As2HA
— Matt Orfalea (@0rf) March 6, 2025
American Made Patriotic Apparel – Save 15% with Promo Code MERICA
The uniformity of this messaging raises further questions about the media’s role in protecting Biden’s image, despite clear indications of his decline.
Biden’s cognitive issues came to a head during his June debate against Donald Trump on CNN, a moment many political analysts believe was a turning point in the election.
The president’s inability to deliver coherent responses and his visibly frail demeanor left many in his own party alarmed.
Following the debate, discussions about his fitness for office intensified, with some Democrats openly questioning whether he should continue his campaign.
The contrast between Biden’s last State of the Union address and his debate performance was stark.
While some in the media had suggested that his State of the Union speech demonstrated renewed energy and leadership, any perceived momentum quickly collapsed within months.
By the time of the debate, doubts about his ability to serve another term had reached a breaking point.
Biden’s presidency was marked by growing dissatisfaction, not only from political opponents but also from within his own party.
Concerns over his ability to effectively govern were compounded by policy failures, economic struggles, and a lack of clear direction from the White House.
In hindsight, many Americans saw Biden as an unsuitable choice for the presidency, leading to what some have called widespread voter remorse.
Despite efforts by the media and political allies to downplay concerns about Biden’s mental acuity, the reality became undeniable.
His administration’s attempts to control the narrative and shield him from scrutiny ultimately failed, leaving the country to confront the consequences of an increasingly detached and ineffective leader.
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of LifeZette. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.
Read the full article here