Mississippi lawmakers are taking a direct swing at the modern recruiting game by trying to remove state income tax from college athletes’ name, image and likeness earnings.
The Mississippi House passed House Bill 4014, which would exempt NIL compensation from Mississippi state income tax. The bill’s author is Rep. Jonathan McMillan, a first term Republican. The House approved the measure 76 to 32.
The bill defines NIL compensation broadly, covering “any money, goods, or services” provided to an intercollegiate athlete enrolled at a Mississippi school in exchange for the athlete’s name, image, or likeness. It also specifically includes revenue sharing or NIL payments from a school or a third party.
Here’s What They’re Not Telling You About Your Retirement
Supporters framed the push as a competitiveness issue in the SEC, where several states already function like built in “no state income tax” billboards. House Ways and Means chairman Rep. Trey Lamar presented the bill and argued the state needs to keep up: “There’s other states doing it. I believe Mississippi needs to remain competitive in that arena.”
The math behind the pitch is straightforward. Mississippi currently applies a 4% tax on income over $10,000 in 2026, and that rate is scheduled to keep dropping until it reaches 3% in 2030. If an athlete makes $1 million in eligible earnings, the difference is $40,000 in state tax that would no longer be owed. Federal taxes would still apply.
The proposal is also a clear response to recruiting pitches coming from states with no income tax at all. Florida, Tennessee, and Texas don’t levy a state income tax, and Arkansas passed a similar NIL tax exemption last year. With the transfer portal and NIL deals turning roster building into a year round process, Mississippi is trying to remove one more reason for a player to look elsewhere.
The bill still has steps remaining. It must pass the Mississippi Senate and then be signed by Gov. Tate Reeves to become law.
This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year
The measure drew pushback during debate, including questions about fairness and the cumulative impact of exemptions. During the House discussion, Rep. Daryl Porter asked Lamar whether repeated exemptions leave the state short on revenue. Others questioned why athletes would be treated differently than other workers.
The potential benefit to high earning players is not theoretical. The debate has already included references to Ole Miss quarterback Trinidad Chambliss, who is expected to earn at least $5 million in NIL and revenue sharing and would keep that income free from Mississippi state tax if the bill becomes law.
The larger context is that college sports is increasingly hunting for edges that used to sit outside the game itself. There are still the usual levers (facilities, coaching staffs, depth charts, and schedules) but now tax treatment is being discussed like it’s another line in the recruiting packet. Mississippi is also phasing down its broader income tax over the next decade, assuming economic triggers are met, and HB 4014 would be a targeted carve out for athletes while that longer timeline plays out.
For Mississippi schools, the bill is positioned as a way to keep pace in a conference where money, movement, and marketing collide every offseason. For everyone else, it is another sign that the sport’s “arms race” now includes the fine print.
Warning: Account balances and purchasing power no longer tell the same story. Know in 2 minutes if your retirement is working for you.
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of LifeZette. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.
Read the full article here


