The House of Representatives voted Tuesday afternoon to formally rebuke Democratic Illinois Rep. Chuy García for effectively choosing his successor in a retirement scheme that critics have labeled a coronation.
A group of 23 Democrats, including the resolution’s sponsor Washington Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, joined nearly all voting Republicans in denouncing García for “undermining the process of a free and fair election” with the timing of his retirement announcement. House Democratic leadership failed to prevent a mass exodus of Democrats from supporting the symbolic resolution calling out anti-democratic behavior in their caucus. (RELATED: Democrats Gang Up On Colleague For Having Nerve To Call Out Fellow Dem For ‘Election Subversion’)
“Congressman Chuy García has been a progressive champion and voice for the voiceless in his community for decades,” House Democratic leadership said in a joint statement Tuesday in an attempt to head off defections from their own caucus. “We unequivocally oppose this misguided resolution.”
However, a majority of lawmakers appeared to have been persuaded by Gluesenkamp Perez’s argument that García’s retirement gambit constituted “election subversion.”
García, 69, announced his decision to not seek reelection after the filing deadline to run for his seat had passed, leaving his chief of staff, who entered the race hours before the cutoff date, the Democratic Party’s automatic nominee.
Garcí1 has denied effectively hand-picking his successor, but he told the Chicago Sun Times that he helped his chief of staff collect the requisite signatures necessary to qualify for the primary ballot. García did not announce his retirement until several days after the filing deadline.
“You don’t get your cake and eat it too,” Gluesenkamp Perez said on the House floor Monday. “If you’re not going to run, you don’t get to choose your successor no matter how noble the work you have done beforehand.”
WASHINGTON, DC – SEPTEMBER 25: Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D-WA) arrives for a vote series at the U.S. Capitol on September 25, 2024 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)
A group of progressive House Democrats railed against Gluesenkamp Perez on the House floor Monday night for advancing her resolution over House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries’ explicit objection.
“Chuy Garcia has stood his ground in moments when others have not, including the sponsor of this resolution of disapproval who has opened the doors to authoritarianism by the way she votes,” Democratic Illinois Rep. Delia Ramirez said while taking aim at Glusenkamp Perez’s moderate voting record.
Democratic Washington Rep. Pramila Jayapal, the leader of the congressional progressive caucus, also criticized the resolution in a brief interview with the Daily Caller News Foundation.
“I think that it’s a very unusual and unique situation, and I think that there should be laws in every state that ensure that somebody can’t drop out at the last minute without fairness,” Jayapal said. “But I don’t understand why somebody from my home state of Washington would be opining a resolution of disapproval. Like, why not work to change the law in Illinois?”
The Congressional Leadership Fund, a top GOP super PAC involved in House races, criticized Gluesenkamp Perez for failing to have the same energy for condemning the party’s apparent coronation of former Vice President Kamala Harris in the 2024 presidential election.
Democrats, however, were eligible to challenge Harris for the presidential nomination unlike García’s eleventh-hour retirement move.
“Marie Gluesenkamp Perez was complicit in the anointing of Kamala Harris and disenfranchisement of millions of Washington State voters,” CLF spokeswoman Lydia Hall said in a statement. “Why does she suddenly care that Illinois voters are being disenfranchised but didn’t care when it was happening in her home state and the entire country?”
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].
Read the full article here


