NYT Columnist's Hot Take on Arrested Judge's Crime Leaves Viewers Flabbergasted [WATCH]

Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan is facing serious allegations after being accused of assisting an illegal immigrant defendant in evading federal authorities, raising significant concerns over judicial conduct and media coverage.

According to government officials, Dugan allegedly directed federal agents away from the hallway outside her courtroom, instructing them to visit the chief judge.

Wild! Attorney General Pam Bondi explains what really happened with Milwaukee Judge Hannah Dugan that led to her arrest by FBI:

“The Judge learns that ICE was outside to get the guy, because he had been deported in 2013, came back into our country, charged with committing these… pic.twitter.com/Af7a1JdJR4

— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) April 25, 2025

Trump’s Sovereign Wealth Fund: What Could It Mean For Your Money?

During this diversion, Dugan reportedly escorted defendant Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, who was scheduled to appear before her, out of another exit.

Flores-Ruiz, an illegal immigrant previously deported and re-entered into the United States, was facing multiple domestic violence charges.

This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year

The affidavit detailing the incident also noted that Flores-Ruiz’s case was never officially called for hearing.

When the state’s attorney questioned the delay, it was discovered that the case had been adjourned, despite the presence of both the prosecutor and the victims who were awaiting proceedings.

The incident has drawn criticism from legal experts. CNN legal analyst Elie Honig stated, “If the allegations against Dugan are true, it is a crime,” emphasizing the severity of the charges.

Despite the nature of the allegations, some members of the media have attempted to frame the situation differently.

New York Times columnist David Brooks made headlines after commenting on the case during a public appearance, suggesting that Dugan’s alleged actions could be viewed as “heroic.”

“Well, obviously, they’re trying to send a note of intimidation, not only to her, but to all judges and maybe to all Americans,” Brooks said, although he acknowledged he did not know the specific details of the case.

Brooks continued, “And to me, if she—let’s say she did escort this guy out the door. If federal enforcement agencies come to your courtroom and you help a guy escape, that is two things. One, it strikes me as maybe something illegal, but it also strikes me as something heroic.”

He added that “in times of trouble, people are sometimes called to do civil disobedience,” arguing that while the action could be illegal, it could also be morally justified in his view.

His remarks concluded, according to Mediaite, with the comment that “sometimes civil disobedience is necessary.”

🚨NYT’s David Brooks doesn’t “know the specific details” of the Judge Dugan case — but says she was “heroic.”

“If the federal enforcement agencies come to your courtroom and you help a guy escape, that is two things…”

“One, it strikes me as maybe something illegal, but it… pic.twitter.com/1Ia7BaxW7R

— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) April 27, 2025

Brooks’ statements have sparked backlash, with critics pointing out the inconsistency between calls for upholding the rule of law and applauding alleged illegal behavior by a sitting judge.

The commentary has fueled broader concerns over how sections of the media approach coverage involving illegal immigration and judicial accountability.

The Department of Justice has not yet announced whether formal charges will be filed against Dugan.

The situation remains under investigation, and Dugan has not publicly commented on the allegations.

The controversy highlights growing tensions between enforcement of immigration laws and the shifting narratives in parts of the media landscape, as attention now turns to how the legal system will address the accusations against Judge Dugan.