Obama’s Presidential Library Exposed for Discriminating Against Illegal Aliens [WATCH]

An exchange between Kayleigh McEnany and Rep. Brandon Gill focused on voter eligibility standards and immigration policy, with both raising concerns about differences in requirements tied to voting and other institutions.

McEnany pointed to what she described as an inconsistency involving citizenship requirements, referencing rules tied to the Obama Presidential Center.

“The SAVE America Act is proving citizenship while voting,” McEnany said.

“So we did find this rather ironic.”

Here’s What They’re Not Telling You About Your Retirement

She continued by referencing eligibility requirements connected to the center.

“We all know that Obama has a big, beautiful presidential library coming make your own opinions, but when you look at the requirement for the opening of that library, it says promotion open only to US citizens or lawful permanent US residents who are legal residents of the 50 United States.”

McEnany then questioned why those standards differ from voting requirements. “Why do we have stricter standards for the Obama Library than for voting?” she asked.

Gill responded by outlining his view on Democratic immigration and election policies, linking the issue to broader political strategy.

“Well, because Democrats would like to allow non citizens to vote in American elections,” Gill said.

“That’s a core part of their long term political strategy.”

He continued by describing what he believes is the goal behind those policies. “Is flooding the country with illegal aliens trying to give them amnesty so they can vote for Democrats,” Gill said.

Gill also addressed election systems, stating, “And in the meantime, having open election systems and trying to get these these illegals, to vote for Democrats as much as they possibly can.”

This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year

He emphasized the potential impact of even small numbers of votes in close elections.

“Remember, it only takes a few fraudulent votes in key swing states and key swing districts to swing even a presidential election,” Gill said.

Gill added that he views the issue as having significant national implications. “So the stakes couldn’t be higher, and that’s why we have to fight for this legislation,” he said.

He urged that the issue be treated with urgency. “We’ve got to take it seriously,” Gill said.

Gill also expressed concern about how the issue is being handled in the Senate.

“And again, I don’t think the Senate is, candidly,” he said.

WATCH:

Warning: Account balances and purchasing power no longer tell the same story. Know in 2 minutes if your retirement is working for you.