PA Supreme Court Stops Democrats From Counting Illegal Votes For Bob Casey [WATCH]

Republican Dave McCormick secured victory over incumbent Sen. Bob Casey (D-PA) in Pennsylvania’s closely watched Senate race, but the post-election process was marked by significant controversy.

Despite trailing in votes with no clear path to victory, Casey initially refused to concede, sparking a legal battle over the handling of ballots.

The McCormick campaign, along with Republican legal teams, accused Democrats of attempting to count ineligible ballots in an effort to overturn the election results.

Trump Surges To Victory – Get the Ultimate Trumpinator Bobblehead To Celebrate 2024!

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court intervened, ordering an immediate halt to the counting of ballots deemed illegal, particularly in areas such as Bucks County, where Democratic officials had attempted to include provisional ballots that did not meet authenticity benchmarks.

In Bucks County, Democratic commissioners defied court orders by declaring they would include ballots flagged as invalid.

#BucksCounty Democrat Commissioners violate the rule of law and ignore PA Supreme Court ruling!

Democrat Commissioners Diane Marseglia and Bob Harvie voted today to count illegal ballots, against PA Supreme Court ruling, in an attempt to aid former Senator Bob Casey.… pic.twitter.com/qAdFlVchmh

— Bucks GOP (@BucksGOP) November 14, 2024

The move prompted swift legal action from Republicans, culminating in the court ruling to cease counting these ballots.

McCormick’s lead was widely regarded as insurmountable by both parties.

A significant portion of the remaining uncounted votes came from Republican-leaning areas, including Cambria County, where McCormick’s support was strong.

Provisional ballots, many of which were rejected for failing to meet necessary requirements, were unlikely to shift the outcome in Casey’s favor.

“Despite the attempts to undermine the integrity of this election, the voters have spoken, and we are confident in the results,” a spokesperson for the McCormick campaign said.

The controversy surrounding the election escalated during what Republicans described as an unnecessary recount.

Democrats sought to include ballots that failed to meet established legal standards, including those lacking proper signatures and postmarks.

The Republican legal team successfully argued that these ballots should be excluded under Pennsylvania election law.

The PA Supreme Court has sided with the McCormick campaign and ordering an immediate end to the unlawful acts of the counties on this issue. Again the race was over but now it’s reallyx3 over

— Mark Davin Harris (@markdharris) November 18, 2024

“The Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s ruling is a victory for election integrity and the rule of law,” the McCormick campaign stated following the decision. “It is imperative that every legal vote is counted and that the will of the voters is respected.”

The Pennsylvania Senate race is being viewed as a bellwether for broader national trends, with Republicans making gains in key battleground states.

McCormick’s victory over Casey, a longtime Democratic incumbent, signals a significant shift in voter sentiment within the state.

The legal challenges also highlight ongoing concerns about election security and ballot handling, issues that have taken center stage in national political discourse.

Republican officials have vowed to continue advocating for reforms to ensure transparency and fairness in future elections.

With the legal challenges resolved and McCormick’s victory secured, attention now turns to the incoming senator’s policy agenda.

McCormick has pledged to prioritize economic growth, border security, and support for Pennsylvania’s energy industry.

Meanwhile, Democrats face questions about their handling of the election and the broader implications for their electoral strategy in future races.

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of LifeZette. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.