Scott Jennings Drops a Well-Timed ‘Sucks to Be You’ On This Dem CNN Panelist [WATCH]

A heated exchange unfolded during a recent CNN segment between Republican commentator Scott Jennings and Democratic strategist Madeline Summerville as the two debated the outcome of the government shutdown and its political fallout.

The shutdown began after Democrats refused to pass a continuing resolution unless it included provisions for expanded health care coverage for illegal aliens and continued funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which oversees NPR.

The Trump administration and Republican lawmakers rejected those demands, calling them unacceptable additions to a short-term funding bill.

After 42 days of negotiations, Democrats ultimately agreed to a deal that closely resembled the initial proposal from Republicans and the White House.

The agreement funds the government through January 30 and extends the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) through September 2026.

A separate vote on Affordable Care Act subsidies was scheduled for mid-October as part of the compromise.

Despite the outcome, Summerville claimed during the panel discussion that the situation “has to suck for Republicans,” prompting a sharp response from Jennings.

This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year

“I don’t know you very well, but I can assure you that Donald Trump being President versus Joe Biden in no way, shape, or form sucks for me,” Jennings said.

He added that Democrats had struggled to maintain leadership cohesion during the shutdown, saying Summerville and her party “couldn’t definitively point out who was in charge over the last four years.” Summerville acknowledged the point during the exchange.

Scott Jennings shuts down CNN’s Madeline Summerville.

“This sucks for you guys, because Trump has put you in a very difficult position”

“I don’t know you very well, but I can assure you that Donald Trump being President versus Joe Biden in no way shape or form sucks for me” pic.twitter.com/ZbRtRq0Cqo

— Thomas Hern (@ThomasMHern) November 12, 2025

The shutdown ended with little change from the Republicans’ original proposal.

The continuing resolution Democrats had previously rejected maintained spending at existing levels and was designed to provide several weeks for Congress to complete the remaining 12 appropriations bills.

Republicans and the Trump administration argued that Democrats’ prolonged opposition was a political maneuver that backfired.

The insistence on linking unrelated spending priorities—such as expanded health care coverage for non-citizens and funding for NPR—to must-pass legislation resulted in significant political and public pressure against Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and his caucus.

The shutdown, now referred to by some lawmakers as the “Schumer shutdown,” marked one of the most contentious spending battles in recent years.

During the standoff, millions of federal employees faced delayed paychecks, and several public services were temporarily suspended.

Republicans emphasized that the delay also disrupted progress on key appropriations bills and delayed other legislative priorities.

According to budget officials, the continuing resolution now in place keeps government operations funded at levels consistent with those passed during the Biden-Harris administration, pending final appropriations discussions in early 2026.

Democrats’ handling of the issue has drawn criticism from across the aisle, including from members of their own party.

Several Senate Democrats, including Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA), publicly questioned the wisdom of using a government shutdown as leverage over health care and cultural spending issues.

Analysts say the episode reflects deeper divisions within the Democratic Party over how to approach negotiations with a Republican-led Congress and the Trump administration.