Study: 91% of Patients in Study Show Cardiovascular Side Effects From Moderna Vaccine

Vaccines are a tool in the public health toolbox. That’s it. 

Yet if you were to listen to most vaccine advocates, getting vaccines is akin to a sacrament, and any doubt about the safety or efficacy of even one vaccine is akin to heresy, and deserving of being thrown onto the pyre in an auto-da-fé.

It’s insane, but that’s where we are in debates these days. Whatever one is arguing about is really a proxy fight in a class war between technocrats and the people they want to rule through bullying. 

I happen to think a little thing called “evidence” matters, and I kinda like it when evidence is provided to substantiate or disprove claims. That is especially true when the matter is something that has a large impact on my life or our society, and the claims made about the COVID vaccine definitely fit into that category.

From the moment the COVID vaccines were released, the public was gaslit about their safety and efficacy. Many of the claims were pure bovine excrement, such as the claim that recipients of the vaccine couldn’t contract or transmit the virus. The former was not evident in the original studies (and turned out to be the opposite of the truth), and the latter claim was never even tested before release. 

And that’s just efficacy. Safety is even more important, and the studies were so small and poorly designed that only the most gross safety signals could possibly have been picked up. It turns out that all the claims about how benign the vaccines are are pure BS, and all the people making those claims had every reason to know that they were deceiving people. 

After all, no medical treatment, even the very best and safest, presents no risk of negative side effects. A novel vaccine using an experimental technique never before tried seems a bad candidate to make extraordinary claims about. 

The longer the vaccines have been around, the more the evidence suggests that they are far more dangerous than advertised, and that we will be discovering new problems for years. This should come as no surprise. mRNA technology was untried, and unlike traditional vaccines, it relies on hijacking our own cells to produce a toxin in unregulated quantities. Who knew what would happen?

Well, another study examining the effect of the Moderna mRNA COVID vaccine has come out, and it shows that over 90% of people who get the Moderna vaccine experience cardiovascular side effects. 

https://t.co/o6mFMaJnor

— Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella🐭 (@Fynnderella1) October 28, 2025

The effects are usually subtle, but that doesn’t mean they are benign. People who get the vaccine experience a measurable and significant decline in arterial flexibility—a hardening of the arteries—that could have significant impacts on their health long-term. 

Abstract

Vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have demonstrated strong efficacy in preventing symptomatic disease, but adverse cardiovascular side effects have been reported. This study investigated whether noninvasive arterial pulse waveform analysis could help identify cardiovascular responses following administration of Moderna’s mRNA-1273 vaccine. Radial blood pressure waveforms were recorded for 1 min in 203 individuals who received the vaccine at a medical center. Participants were categorized into four groups: no side effects (n = 18), cardiac side effects (n = 45), vascular side effects (n = 68), and combined cardiac or vascular side effects (n = 72). Spectral analysis was performed on 40 harmonic indices derived from the pulse waveform, including amplitude proportions, phase angles, and variability indices. These features were analyzed using both a self-developed pulse distribution method and a standard machine learning (ML) algorithm. Significant changes in spectral indices were observed post-vaccination. The pulse distribution method achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.76 in detecting cardiovascular side effects, outperforming the ML approach. The performance was not significantly influenced by potential confounders. These findings suggest that vaccine-induced vascular stiffness may cause a mismatch in elastic properties of the vasculature, and that spectral analysis of the arterial pulse may offer a noninvasive approach to assess such changes.

This finding, in itself, doesn’t mean that nobody should get the COVID vaccine—one has to evaluate relative risks between possible outcomes, which means that the decision should be made on a case-by-case basis for patients, and even then, the decision would be made under conditions of significant uncertainty. 

What it does mean, for certain, is that people who are at low risk for severe side effects from COVID, which is, for most people, a bad cold, might want to consider whether putting a substance that is toxic to their arteries into their bodies. 

We already knew that the vaccine was extremely toxic if the injection went directly into the circulatory system—studies in Germany of people who died shortly after getting the vaccine indicated that it was likely they had been accidentally injected into a vein or artery, and their heart was damaged. That’s why, in some countries, the people who give the vaccines are told to aspirate before injection to ensure that no blood is taken up into the needle. 

Now it seems the spike protein produced by the body may injure the circulatory system as it circulates. Not to the same extent as an accidental injection into the bloodstream, but significant nonetheless. 

This should shock nobody. Not to say that the effect should have been predicted, but rather that our ignorance of possible problems should have been a red flag. At a minimum, public health officials should have been more cautious about their claims. 

But caution was the opposite of their goal. They wanted everybody to get vaccinated, and needed a clear, consistent, and dishonest narrative to make that happen. 

The result is that vast numbers of people don’t trust them on this or anything else. And they have earned that distrust. 

If they lied about this, what else have they lied about? 

The irony is obvious: our “experts” wanted to tamp down any vaccine hesitancy, so they told a “noble lie” to get people to do what they wanted. Now that the lie is obvious, we don’t trust them on anything. FAFO. 

Editor’s Note: The Schumer Shutdown is here. Rather than put the American people first, Chuck Schumer and the radical Democrats forced a government shutdown for healthcare for illegals. They own this.

Help us continue to report the truth about the Schumer Shutdown. Use promo code POTUS47 to get 74% off your VIP membership.