UK Government Labels 42% of its Country ‘Terrorists’

They are not referring to the hundreds of thousands of migrants–legal and illegal–who have poured out into the streets to protest in support of Hamas. 

Nope. The UK government has labeled British citizens as supporters of extremist terrorist ideologies if they believe that Western Culture is under threat from the flood of migrants who spend countless hours flooding into the streets waving Hamas flags and screaming about Sharia law. 

The British state has now declared civic nationalism an extremist ideology. pic.twitter.com/s9OwETEhz0

— Lord Bebo (@MyLordBebo) June 8, 2025

Seriously. 

CAPTURED PREVENT IS UNFIT FOR PURPOSE

“Concern over mass migration is terrorist ideology,” says Prevent

Prevent’s unquestioning embrace of uncontrolled immigration is more than concerning. It’s a national security risk. Prevent needs to be investigated! https://t.co/bw2vbb1qri

— Martin Daubney 🇬🇧 (@MartinDaubney) June 6, 2025

I keep using the term “transnationalist,” and I am certain that many people consider that a buzzword meant to delegitimize the technocratic elite. 

To which I say the obvious: if the people in charge of our governments, our security services, our media, and our education are now in the business of declaring an allegiance to one’s nation and one’s culture an extremist, “terrorist” ideology, what else could you call them but “transnationalists?” They literally define anybody who loves their country and culture and wants to preserve them as evil. 

Concern about mass migration is a “terrorist ideology” that requires intervention by the Government’s anti-radicalisation Prevent programme, according to official documents.

An online training course hosted on the Government’s website for Prevent lists “cultural nationalism” as a belief that could lead to an individual being referred to the deradicalisation scheme.

This encompasses a conviction that “Western culture is under threat from mass migration and a lack of integration by certain ethnic and cultural groups”, staff taking the course are told.

It is the latest example of officials, police and the courts appearing to restrict free speech.

In recent weeks, The Telegraph has disclosed that a pensioner was wrongly arrested for warning of anti-Semitism on Twitter, as well as highlighting the case of a man who was given a criminal sentence for burning the Koran.

The Prevent programme was the subject of a damning report two years ago and failed to stop Axel Rudakubana, the Southport killer, who was referred to it on three separate occasions.

No doubt, there are nationalists who are evil, because any set of views can inspire unstable people to behave in an evil fashion, but holding what was until about 5 minutes ago an almost universal belief is now a “terrorist” is insane. As UK politicians fall all over themselves to praise the Islamists who have rampaged in British cities, they turn their fire and their ire on British citizens for being appalled. 

In a letter to Ms Cooper, Lord Young said this was a “matter of serious concern”.

He said: “While not defined in law, nor subject to statutory constraint, the definition in the training course expands the scope of suspicion to include individuals whose views are entirely lawful but politically controversial.

“Now that ‘cultural nationalism’ has been classified as a subcategory of extreme Right-wing terrorist ideology, even mainstream, Right-of-centre beliefs risk being treated as ideologically suspect, despite falling well within the bounds of lawful expression.

“Topics captured under the Prevent category of ‘cultural nationalism’ include widely held views, ranging from concerns about immigration and social cohesion to the belief that integration should be a policy priority, and that shared cultural norms help sustain a liberal society.”

Lord Young suggested the definition could even capture Mr Jenrick, the former immigration minister, who has previously warned that “excessive, uncontrolled migration threatens to cannibalise the compassion of the British public.”

Senior Labour politicians could also fall within the scope of the definition, he claimed. Lord Young cited Sir Keir’s recent statement that without fair immigration rules, “we risk becoming an island of strangers, not a nation that walks forward together.”

You will notice that the definition of “cultural nationalism” is characterized as “right-wing,” which is especially important because some Labour ministers have been walking back their support of unlimited migration, at least rhetorically. For obvious reasons–Brits are tired of the migrant invasion. 

Holy. Shit.

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer says the UK is becoming an “island of strangers”

“The current system is contributing to forces that are slowly pulling our country apart. I believe we need to reduce immigration, significantly.”

Pendulum is swinging across the West. pic.twitter.com/s33R7iFU66

— Geiger Capital (@Geiger_Capital) May 12, 2025

By labeling the movement “right-wing,” the government can pick and choose who it targets for enhanced scrutiny. Keir Starmer will be fine for making his comments, while some Reform politicians will be targeted as “extremists” with a terrorist ideology. 

It’s a similar move to what we are seeing across Europe. It is the foundation for attacking Giorgia Meloni and Marine Le Pen and for labeling AfD “extremist.” Eastern European countries are being fined and even having their elections canceled because they oppose mass migration. 

The Telegraph disclosed last month that Julian Foulkes, a retired police officer, was arrested and detained over a social media post warning about the threat of anti-Semitism. Officers who conducted a search of his house described a collection of books by authors such as Mr Murray as “very Brexity”. Mr Foulkes later received an apology and £20,000 compensation.

Last year, Allison Pearson, the Telegraph columnist, was questioned at home by two officers over an X post following pro-Palestinian protests.

The Telegraph has also covered the case of Hamit Koskun, who was fined this week for burning a Koran. It led Mr Jenrick to accuse the courts of reviving blasphemy law.

Lord Young said the course material appeared to reflect a shift in the Prevent approach from focusing on conduct – such as acquiring weapons or inciting violence – to “treating ideology itself as a risk indicator, encompassing belief, alignment or political attitude”.

He said the FSU had already had to support members referred to Prevent, including a 24-year-old autistic man whose social worker reported that he had been viewing “offensive and anti-trans” websites and “focusing on lots of Right-wing dark comedy”.

Over 40% of Brits believe that mass migration is one of the biggest threats to Britain, and now over 40% of Brits have been labeled supporters of terrorist ideology. 

Brexit was supposed to save Britain from this. It failed.