You Will NOT Believe It, But Dems Picked Hillary to Criticize Trump on Protecting Secrets

Hillary Clinton knows a lot about protecting national security. She wrote the book on how to circumvent every security practice known to mankind. 

While I feel confident that she didn’t have a Chinese or Russian handler, she might as well have had one. She pursued policies that grossly weakened the United States, created chaos around the world through pushing “color revolutions” that put terrorists and adversaries in charge of strategically important countries, helped spark the first Ukrainian war in 2014, and created the conditions for the second and ongoing war. 

She did so all while using her email server as a way to get, store, and distribute classified information. This violated security regulations regarding the handling of classified documents, allowed at least two adversaries to hack the email of the Secretary of State, and when she was caught, she destroyed all the information irretrievably using Bleachbit. 

Given this record, you would think that the Democrats would find a different messenger to push forward their campaign to disrupt Donald Trump’s cabinet. 

If you want to read what pile of human garbage @HillaryClinton wrote without having to log in or pay The NY Times, you can find it here for free. https://t.co/3eNCHPr66G https://t.co/f7mZKlEI1X

— Derek Hunter (@derekahunter) March 28, 2025

But no, they went straight to Hillary Rodham Clinton, who has helped lead the charge in the fight against the sexual abuse of women after slandering Bill’s victims and piously proclaiming her commitment to humanitarian principles after pillaging billions in aid to Haiti, the poorest country in the Western Hemisphere. 

It’s not the hypocrisy that bothers me; it’s the stupidity. We’re all shocked — shocked! — that President Trump and his team don’t actually care about protecting classified information or federal record retention laws. But we knew that already. What’s much worse is that top Trump administration officials put our troops in jeopardy by sharing military plans on a commercial messaging app and unwittingly invited a journalist into the chat. That’s dangerous. And it’s just dumb.

Chutzpah, thy name is Hillary Clinton. And, for that matter, the Democratic Party, which sends Adam Schiff out there to attack dishonesty and Stacey Abrams to denounce election denial. 

This is the party that thinks Tim Walz is a paragon of masculinity and will break through to young white males simply because he likes hanging around with middle- and high-school gay kids. 

My view on @cnn last night: No more lectures from the condescending Biden regime on military accountability and national security. Done with it. Throw it back in their face and don’t stop. pic.twitter.com/Xo0UBIdhno

— Scott Jennings (@ScottJenningsKY) March 28, 2025

The irony is that not a single high-level Democrat sees the irony. The best they can muster–and I have seen them do so–is the “do you believe two wrongs make a right?” as if they ever admitted the first wrong at all. Their outrage is fake, as is their horror at the potential exposure of national security secrets. 

I am not hypocritical enough not to admit that somebody in the administration blew it big time by letting scumbag “journalist” Jeffrey Goldberg in on the group chat discussing the strike on the Houthis. IT SHOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED, and the reason must be tracked down and fixed. As I said yesterday, the “scandal” ranks as a 2 out of 10 on the scandal meter–not a non-event, but a no-harm no foul one. 

At least no harm to national security, but modest harm to the reputations of Waltz and Hegseth. This was an unforced error (or, perhaps, sabotage), and more serious people have a right to be worried and track down and fix the problem. A lot of 2 out of 10s can add up, especially when they create public controversies. 

But HILLARY CLINTON? She is the author of so many security risks, massive scandals, conspiracies to defraud America, cases of perjury, and retention of government records violations that even if Hegseth or Waltz did this intentionally their failure would be lost in the cloud of Clinton offenses. 

But this is a piece in The New York Times. Pravda is their nickname, and gullible is the primary characteristic of their readers. 

These people actually supported Hillary for president, think her a paragon of virtue and exemplar of wisdom, and nod along seriously as she spews lies as people with dysentery spew disgusting bodily fluids. 

My God, I weep for the center-left. Some day they will wake up and see what they wrought and despair.