By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Concealed RepublicanConcealed Republican
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
Reading: Allie Beth Stuckey reacts: Mail-order abortion pills blocked as Supreme Court battle looms
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Concealed RepublicanConcealed Republican
  • News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Concealed Republican > Blog > News > Allie Beth Stuckey reacts: Mail-order abortion pills blocked as Supreme Court battle looms
News

Allie Beth Stuckey reacts: Mail-order abortion pills blocked as Supreme Court battle looms

Jim Taft
Last updated: May 16, 2026 2:55 am
By Jim Taft 3 Min Read
Share
Allie Beth Stuckey reacts: Mail-order abortion pills blocked as Supreme Court battle looms
SHARE

On May 1, 2026, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled to temporarily reinstate in-person dispensing requirements for the abortion pill mifepristone — blocking its delivery by mail or telemedicine nationwide.

The ruling paused 2023 FDA regulations to allow remote prescribing and was immediately appealed to the Supreme Court.

Dr. Christina Francis tells BlazeTV host Allie Beth Stuckey that one of the co-plaintiffs in the case was coerced into a chemical abortion by her boyfriend, who threatened her if she didn’t take the drugs.

“Thankfully, the Fifth Circuit recognized that this is a real, active danger to state pro-life laws, but also to individual women who are being harmed and, of course, pre-born children who are being harmed by these drugs,” Francis explains.

“And so, the Fifth Circuit said, ‘While this case is making its way through the court, we need that in-person dispensing requirement back immediately,’” she adds.

“But then what happened at the Supreme Court?” Stuckey asks.

“That Fifth Circuit decision was immediately appealed to the Supreme Court by the abortion drug manufacturers,” Francis explains, while Stuckey points out that there are several reasons why it’s so important that the decision to require in-person dispensing of the abortion pill stands.

“Obviously, we don’t want any babies to be killed with the abortion pill at all, but this in-person visit requirement is a really important, not only deterrent possibly, but also just to preserve the safety of the women who are seeking to use this abortion pill,” she says.

“Absolutely,” Francis agrees. “So, we know at its baseline, this abortion drug, mifepristone, is inherently dangerous. It’s four times more dangerous than surgical abortions. But that’s when it’s being dispensed in person.”

“When a woman has an in-person evaluation by a medical professional,” she explains, it makes sure “they know how far along she is in her pregnancy, ensures that she does not have an ectopic pregnancy, which is life-threatening to her, and ensures that she is actually the one who wants the abortion, that it’s not someone forcing her into that.”

And without in-person dispensing, Francis tells Stuckey that “abortion is essentially legal in all 50 states right now.“

“This is a federal mandate that is overriding all state pro-life laws right now,” she adds.

Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Read the full article here

You Might Also Like

Trump bypasses California bureaucracy to unlock $3.2B in wildfire aid

Strait of Hormuz crisis drives push to diversify global energy routes

JD Vance says Democratic mayor responded ‘aggressively’ to 2020 election fraud probe

‘RIGGED’: Supreme Court allows California to use Democrats’ anti-Trump congressional map

Breaking: SCOTUS Says Prosecution of Gun Owner for Marijuana Use ‘Inconsistent’ With Second Amendment

Share This Article
Facebook X Email Print
Previous Article Caitlin Clark honored for massive career milestone before Fever fall in overtime thriller Caitlin Clark honored for massive career milestone before Fever fall in overtime thriller
Next Article Route 66 centennial spurs tourism in historic small towns Route 66 centennial spurs tourism in historic small towns
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

- Advertisement -
Ad image

Latest News

Mullin Unveils Election Crackdown After DHS Finds 278K Noncitizens on the Voter Rolls [WATCH]
Mullin Unveils Election Crackdown After DHS Finds 278K Noncitizens on the Voter Rolls [WATCH]
Politics
Your ‘healthy’ food has a secret ingredient the FDA won’t tell you about
Your ‘healthy’ food has a secret ingredient the FDA won’t tell you about
News
How to watch: England vs France, the 2026 FIFA World Cup Third-Place match
How to watch: England vs France, the 2026 FIFA World Cup Third-Place match
News
New study shows big health disadvantage for women who stay up late — and it isn’t about losing sleep
New study shows big health disadvantage for women who stay up late — and it isn’t about losing sleep
News
DSA plan to abolish the Senate and presidency stuns House Democrats
DSA plan to abolish the Senate and presidency stuns House Democrats
News
‘You should have been aborted’: Why Harvard students greet my pro-life testimony with hate
‘You should have been aborted’: Why Harvard students greet my pro-life testimony with hate
News
© 2025 Concealed Republican. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Press Release
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?