By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Concealed RepublicanConcealed Republican
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
Reading: DOJ Tells SCOTUS Trump’s Moves on Marijuana Doesn’t Impact Pot and Guns Case
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Concealed RepublicanConcealed Republican
  • News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Concealed Republican > Blog > News > DOJ Tells SCOTUS Trump’s Moves on Marijuana Doesn’t Impact Pot and Guns Case
News

DOJ Tells SCOTUS Trump’s Moves on Marijuana Doesn’t Impact Pot and Guns Case

Jim Taft
Last updated: April 23, 2026 8:12 pm
By Jim Taft 5 Min Read
Share
DOJ Tells SCOTUS Trump’s Moves on Marijuana Doesn’t Impact Pot and Guns Case
SHARE

DOJ Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche has signed an order rescheduling marijuana from its current Schedule I classification to Schedule III, which, among other things, will impact state-level medical marijuana laws. 





The move comes as the Supreme Court is deliberating on a case called U.S. v. Hemani, where the DOJ appealed a Fifth Circuit decision that held the federal ban on gun possession by “unlawful” drug users was unconstitutional as it applied to Ali Danial Hemani, who was convicted of possessing firearms while regularly consuming marijuana. 

The website Marijuana Moment reports Solicitor General D. John Sauer sent a letter to the justices on Thursday telling them that the DOJ’s move “does not affect the proper resolution of this case.”

Ali Danial Hemani’s “criminal liability depends on the law that was in effect at the time of the offense rather than the law in effect now,” the solicitor general wrote. “At the time of respondent’s offense, marijuana was classified as a Schedule I controlled substance. Even under the final order, moreover, respondent’s marijuana would remain a Schedule I controlled substance because it was neither incorporated into an FDA-approved drug product nor covered by a state medical marijuana license.”

“To the extent the Court wishes to avoid deciding the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(3) as applied to medical marijuana,” Sauer said, referring to the federal statute that bars people who use illegal drugs from purchasing or possessing guns, “it could limit its decision in this case to Schedule I marijuana and could leave for a future case the statute’s constitutionality as applied to Schedule III marijuana.”





It could do that, but if the justices rule in favor of Hemani, then the Court is almost guaranteed to conclude that 922(g)(3) is unconstitutional as it applies to Schedule III medical marijuana. 

I agree with Sauer that today’s announcement by Blanche doesn’t really change anything in the Hemani case. Based on how things went for the government during oral arguments, I think there’s a strong likelihood of the Court ruling that the federal prohibition on “unlawful” drug users possessing firearms is too broad, at least as it applies to the plaintiff in this particular case. 

As I wrote after oral arguments took place in early March, even some gun control supporters concluded that Hemani is likely to get a favorable ruling, though they’re not particularly pleased by that potential outcome. 

Jake Charles, the Pepperdine University law professor who used to head up the Duke Center for Firearms Law, posted a lengthy piece on the Center’s blog this week where he concluded that he has “trouble readily locating—at least from the arguments—another vote in the government’s camp” beyond Justice Samuel Alito and Chief Justice John Roberts. 

Charles says his “wildly speculative guess is that he gets somewhere between 6-7 votes,” which is exactly where most 2A supporters have come down as well (including me). I think 7-2 is the most likely outcome, but I could a 6-3 decision with Thomas or Kagan joining the minority in declaring 922(g)(3) valid when it comes to “unlawful” marijuana use. 





I don’t think we’re going to see unanimity among the conservatives on the Court, but my suspicion is that Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson will side with Hemani; not because of an innate support for the right to keep and bear arms, but because the government failed to prove that marijuana users are inherently so dangerous that they must be forbidden from possessing firearms. Today’s move by the Trump administration may not have a direct impact on Hemani, but it is further proof that, like it or not, marijuana usage has become so prevalent that an outright prohibition is both politically and legally untenable. 


Editor’s Note: The radical Left will stop at nothing to enact their radical gun control agenda and strip us of our Second Amendment rights.

Help us continue to report on and expose the Democrats’ gun control policies and schemes. Join Bearing Arms VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.



Read the full article here

You Might Also Like

It gets worse for Nashville Democrat who ‘hates’ her own city: ‘Burning down a police station is justified’

I came to the US legally. What we have now isn’t immigration — it’s chaos.

Ohio Worker Finds Guns in Strange Place

Virginia Democrats Approve ‘Assault Firearm’ Ban

Fathers step up to defend girls’ sports after liberal state defies President Trump — and biology

Share This Article
Facebook X Email Print
Previous Article 14-year-old thug body-slams, head-stomps girl on Harlem street — reportedly after she wouldn’t give him her phone number 14-year-old thug body-slams, head-stomps girl on Harlem street — reportedly after she wouldn’t give him her phone number
Next Article NYT Platforms Far-Left Youth Leader To Promote Stealing NYT Platforms Far-Left Youth Leader To Promote Stealing
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

- Advertisement -
Ad image

Latest News

New Report Says Gavin Newsom Spent B to Bring in 400,000 Illegal Aliens
New Report Says Gavin Newsom Spent $1B to Bring in 400,000 Illegal Aliens
Politics
California Governor Candidates Agree: Requiring Truck Drivers to Speak English Is Racist
California Governor Candidates Agree: Requiring Truck Drivers to Speak English Is Racist
Politics
NYT Platforms Far-Left Youth Leader To Promote Stealing
Virginia Senator Says He Can Relate To Rural Americans Because He Watched ‘The Dukes Of Hazzard’
Politics
Armed Celebrity Holds Home Invader at Gunpoint Until Police Arrive
Armed Celebrity Holds Home Invader at Gunpoint Until Police Arrive
News
Navy secretary abruptly fired despite ongoing Iran blockade
Navy secretary abruptly fired despite ongoing Iran blockade
News
Patriots back Mike Vrabel amid Russini controversy before NFL Draft
Patriots back Mike Vrabel amid Russini controversy before NFL Draft
News
© 2025 Concealed Republican. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Press Release
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?