ActBlue is the largest PAC which acts as a fundraising platform for Democrats around the country. Today, ActBlue’s CEO Regina Wallace-Jones was questioned by members of congress after reports that she might have previously misled congress about her PAC’s efforts to keep foreign money out of U.S. elections. In response, Wallace-Jones pleaded the Fifth Amendment, refusing to answer all questions.
🚨WOW: ActBlue CEO Regina Wallace-Jones pleads the Fifth to EVERY question from @RepBryanSteil about an allegedly “false and misleading” letter she sent him about fraud prevention policies. pic.twitter.com/ic7U54pphE
— Off The Press (@OffThePress1) June 10, 2026
Even questions about how to address her were off limits.
.@RepLoudermilk: “I want to make sure I’m respectful. Is it Ms. Jones or Ms. Wallace-Jones?”
ActBlue CEO Regina Wallace-Jones takes the Fifth. pic.twitter.com/gtDvKPGsqe
— Jeremy Art (@cspanJeremy) June 10, 2026
It’s true that once you answer a question you are considered to have waived your right to plead the fifth, though I’m not sure clarifying your name would qualify. But I guess she wanted to play it safe.
Over and over, the chief executive, Regina Wallace-Jones, declined to engage with questions from Republicans on the House Administration Committee. She had agreed to appear on Wednesday morning to discuss the committee’s investigation into the operations of ActBlue, which serves as the small-dollar financial engine of the Democratic Party and its candidates.
She invoked her Fifth Amendment right not to testify 22 times in response to questions from House Republicans, including when Representative Barry Loudermilk of Georgia asked whether she went by Ms. Wallace-Jones or Ms. Jones.
The Democrats at the hearing posed no questions to Ms. Wallace-Jones but instead attacked WinRed, the Republican fund-raising platform, and Ken Paxton, the Texas attorney general and Senate nominee who has mounted his own investigation of ActBlue.
The backstory here is pretty simple. In April, the NY Times published a story revealing that a law firm hired by ActBlue warned the PAC that Wallace-Jones may have misled congress.
The firm concluded that ActBlue’s chief executive had given a potentially misleading response to congressional Republican investigators in a 2023 letter explaining how the organization vetted donations to ensure that they were not illegally coming from foreign citizens.
The letter from the chief executive, Regina Wallace-Jones, said ActBlue carried out “multilayered” screenings of contributions that helped “root out” those from overseas. In fact, the law firm found, some of the steps she had described were not always followed.
“This presents a substantial risk for ActBlue,” the law firm, Covington & Burling, wrote in one of two memos expressing legal concerns. One memo raised the specter of a criminal investigation if prosecutors believed that ActBlue had tried to conceal facts about its efforts to prevent foreign contributions.
Taking money from foreign donors is illegal, as is lying to Congress. When the law firm warned the PAC there were a bunch of resignations but at the time no one would say what had prompted them. This report is from March 2025. It would be more than a year before the reasons for these departures was explained.
ActBlue, the online fund-raising organization that powers Democratic candidates, has plunged into turmoil, with at least seven senior officials resigning late last month and a remaining lawyer suggesting he faced internal retaliation.
The departures from ActBlue, which helps raise money for Democrats running for office at all levels of government, come as the group is under investigation by congressional Republicans. They have advanced legislation that some Democrats warn could be used to debilitate what is the party’s leading fund-raising operation.
What prompted so many longtime ActBlue officials to leave is not clear — none of the former officials agreed to be interviewed on the record.
So Republican in congress took an interest once word of the law firm’s warning was made public. But as you’ve seen above, Wallace-Jones refused to answer any questions. She was of course willing to speak where she could not be asked questions or cross-examined, e.g. the pages of the Washington Post:
Invoking the Fifth Amendment is not an admission, or even an insinuation, of guilt. It is not a retreat. It is the only reasonable response to a proceeding that from the beginning has been about harassing a political opponent’s fundraising platform, not genuine oversight. Now it has become something far more dangerous.
…this is not legitimate oversight. It’s a coordinated campaign of political retribution. Wednesday’s hearing is the latest assault in that corrupt campaign.
Congress has no constitutional authority to conduct criminal investigations. The Supreme Court has repeatedly made clear that this role belongs to the executive branch. When a congressional committee works with the Justice Department to target a political adversary, it is not legislating. It has crossed a red line that was drawn into the Constitution for a reason.
I see this sort of reasoning a lot here in California. Democrats don’t ask awkward questions of other Democrats because where’s the upside in doing that. And if Republicans ask questions, they are just partisans with an axe to grind. The result is that no one looks closely at what Democrats are doing. And that’s clearly how they like it.
The NY Times deserves some credit here for following this story when I’m sure most of their readers would rather they not do so. Other news outlets should follow their example. If someone refuses to answer questions on the ground that they might incriminate themselves, that’s a hint there might be a problem.
.@Jim_Jordan: “Did you weaken your fraud standards to help Democrats?”
ActBlue CEO Regina Wallace-Jones: I plead the fifth pic.twitter.com/BZv8RajgxO
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) June 10, 2026
Editor’s Note: Help us continue to report the truth about corrupt politicians.
Join HotAir VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.
Read the full article here
