By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Concealed RepublicanConcealed Republican
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
Reading: California Blocked From Secretly Transitioning Kids In School
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Concealed RepublicanConcealed Republican
  • News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Concealed Republican > Blog > Politics > California Blocked From Secretly Transitioning Kids In School
Politics

California Blocked From Secretly Transitioning Kids In School

Jim Taft
Last updated: December 24, 2025 12:27 am
By Jim Taft 5 Min Read
Share
California Blocked From Secretly Transitioning Kids In School
SHARE

California teachers can no longer hide children’s gender identities from their parents following a permanent injunction issued Monday in a class-action lawsuit.

The lawsuit was filed by teachers who felt a moral duty to protect children and strongly objected to being dishonest with parents about their kids, as the state’s “Parental Exclusion Policies” required them to do. Several California Department of Education policies were “designed to create a zone of secrecy around a school student who expresses gender incongruity,” according to the court order, preventing teachers and school staff from sharing vital information with parents.

“Today’s incredible victory finally, and permanently, ends California’s dangerous and unconstitutional regime of gender secrecy policies in schools,” Paul M. Jonna, special counsel at Thomas More Society, which represented the teachers and parents in the lawsuit, said in a statement following the decision. “The Court’s comprehensive ruling—granting summary judgment on all claims—protects all California parents, students, and teachers, and it restores sanity and common sense. With this decisive ruling from Judge Benitez, all state and local school officials that mandate gender secrecy policies should cease all enforcement or face severe legal consequences.”

California Lieutenant Governer Gavin Newsom drives with his family along the parade route during San Francisco’s Gay Pride festival on June, 30, 2013. (Photo credit Josh Edelson/AFP via Getty Images)

The case explored four questions:

  1. Whether the Fourteenth Amendment’s substantive due process clause provides parents a right to access information about their child’s gender identity
  2. Whether the First Amendment’s free exercise of religion clause does the same
  3. Whether the First Amendment provides religious teachers “a right to provide gender information to parents” based on free exercise protections
  4. Whether the First Amendment provides public school teachers “a right to communicate accurate gender information to parents” based on free speech protections

“In each case, this Court concludes that, as a matter of law, the answer is ‘yes,’” Bush-appointed U.S. District Court Judge Roger T. Benitez wrote in his 52-page opinion. “Parents have a right to receive gender information and teachers have a right to provide to parents accurate information about a child’s gender identity.”

Under Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, California in 2024 became the first state to bar schools from requiring staff to notify parents if a child requests a name or pronoun change, seeks access to opposite-sex facilities, or attempts to join opposite-sex sports teams. State education code permits athletes to participate on whichever team is “consistent with his or her gender identity,” and California’s Civil Rights Act further includes “gender identity” under its definition of sex. (RELATED: Newsom Forces Schools To Promote Radical Trans Group’s LGBTQ ‘Hotline’ On Student IDs)

“Parental involvement [is] essential to the healthy maturation of schoolchildren,” the court opinion reads. “California’s public school system parental exclusion policies place a communication barrier between parents and teachers.”

“Although as stated previously, the State’s desire to protect vulnerable children from harassment and discrimination is laudable, the parental exclusion policies create a trifecta of harm: they harm the child who needs parental guidance and possibly mental health intervention to determine if the incongruence is organic or whether it is the result of bullying, peer pressure, or a fleeting impulse,” the order continues. “They harm the parents by depriving them of the long-recognized Fourteenth Amendment right to care, guide, and make health care decisions for their children, and by substantially burdening many parents’ First Amendment right to train their children in their sincerely held religious beliefs. And finally, they harm teachers who are compelled to violate the sincerely held beliefs and the parent’s rights by forcing them to conceal information they feel is critical for the welfare of their students.”

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

Read the full article here

You Might Also Like

Biden’s FBI Was Not Incompetent, They Were ‘Competent at Corruption’ [WATCH]

Suspect Identified–Donald Trump Confirms Arrest in Charlie Kirk Assassination: ‘We Have Him’ [WATCH]

Locals Taunt Authorities Who Appeared To Be Working In Capital Under Trump’s Crackdown Orders

Mamdani Marks Oct. 7 With 1 Sentence Mourning Hamas Victims, Three Paragraphs Attacking Israel

It’s Still Hard to Build Things in the US

Share This Article
Facebook X Email Print
Previous Article CCRKBA Celebrates DOJ’s Lawsuit Against DC Gun Laws CCRKBA Celebrates DOJ’s Lawsuit Against DC Gun Laws
Next Article Impeaching Judges Is Not an Abuse of Political Power Impeaching Judges Is Not an Abuse of Political Power
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

- Advertisement -
Ad image

Latest News

Who is Saleh Edwards? Wilkes-Barre man faces weapons of mass destruction charges
Who is Saleh Edwards? Wilkes-Barre man faces weapons of mass destruction charges
News
James Woods Calls Out Cringe ‘Buffoon’ Solution as Dems Sink Faster Than the Titanic [WATCH]
James Woods Calls Out Cringe ‘Buffoon’ Solution as Dems Sink Faster Than the Titanic [WATCH]
Politics
Supreme Court: Trump Can’t Deploy National Guard in Chicago
Supreme Court: Trump Can’t Deploy National Guard in Chicago
Politics
California Blocked From Secretly Transitioning Kids In School
Boston Democrat Mayor Michelle Wu Says Somalis To Thank For City’s ‘Every Achievement’
Politics
New Mexico’s Week-Long Waiting Period on Gun Sales Dealt Crippling Blow
New Mexico’s Week-Long Waiting Period on Gun Sales Dealt Crippling Blow
News
The FORGOTTEN voice behind ‘How the Grinch Stole Christmas’
The FORGOTTEN voice behind ‘How the Grinch Stole Christmas’
News
© 2025 Concealed Republican. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Press Release
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?