Court Blocks Massive Payout to E Jean Carroll While Supreme Court Weighs Trump Appeal

A federal appeals court has dealt a major blow to the left’s hopes of cashing in early on one of the most politically charged lawsuits in recent memory.

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that President Donald Trump can continue to delay the enormous eighty three million dollar payout to writer E. Jean Carroll until the Supreme Court decides whether it will review his appeal.

In plain terms, this means the case is far from over, no matter how badly Trump’s opponents wanted to see him cut that massive check.

The left called it a victory for accountability, but this latest development shows that the judicial process is still alive and that Trump’s legal fight remains strong on appeal.

Here’s What They’re Not Telling You About Your Retirement

According to reports from The Hill, the appeals court issued its decision Monday approving a continued stay on payment.

That allows Trump to hold off on paying the eighty three million dollar judgment while he continues to challenge the verdict from the earlier defamation trial.

Carroll’s team did not oppose the delay, so long as Trump agreed to slightly increase the bond to account for additional interest that would build up if he loses his appeal.

In compliance with that order, Trump must now add about 7.46 million dollars to the bond he had already posted.

This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year

This brings the total bond amount to around one hundred million dollars, a staggering figure for a case that was born from statements Trump made while serving as President of the United States.

In January, a Manhattan jury sided with Carroll and slapped Trump with one of the largest defamation awards in American history.

The case stemmed from Trump’s comments rejecting Carroll’s decades old accusation of sexual assault, which he firmly denies to this day.

He called her claims a political hit job designed to smear his name and damage his 2024 re election campaign.

Court paused Trump’s $83 million to EJ Carroll.Didn’t mention allegations in:1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018Until 3 days after Trump announces re-election campaign…Sick.Belongs in jail. pic.twitter.com/yBSWVfbf7Z

— C3 (@C_3C_3) May 13, 2026

Trump’s legal team quickly appealed the decision, arguing that statements he made as president were shielded by federal law and that the verdict was legally flawed.

The appeals process has taken months, and now his request for the Supreme Court to intervene is the final avenue to determine whether the case stands on constitutional grounds.

For now, the appeals court’s decision keeps Trump from having to fork over millions while his legal team continues the fight in higher courts.

This outcome is a setback for Carroll’s lawyers, who had been pushing to collect the judgment as soon as possible, but the justices appear to have signaled that the President’s argument deserves fair consideration before any money changes hands.

🚨 FLASHBACK: E. Jean Carroll on Rachel Maddow bragging how she’d blow the Trump lawsuit money:

“Shopping spree… new shoes, new wardrobe… and I’m buying Rachel a penthouse!”TODAY: Appeals court just BLOCKED her $83 MILLION payout.That battle axe will never see a dime pic.twitter.com/qM3FjMbCxf— Alec Lace (@AlecLace) May 13, 2026

The enormous award has already drawn national outrage among conservatives, who see it as a blatant use of the legal system to punish Trump for his outspoken political style.

Many on the right view these cases not as justice being served but as the continuation of lawfare tactics aimed at drowning Trump in lawsuits to derail his campaign before November.

This ruling demonstrates that the judiciary is not entirely under the grip of partisan forces, despite the best efforts of liberal activists who hoped the case would serve as yet another nail in Trump’s political coffin.

While the mainstream media celebrated the initial verdict as proof of their long running anti Trump narrative, the appeals court has pumped the brakes on their victory laps.

It should also be noted that the Supreme Court may or may not decide to take up the case, but the very fact that the process has reached this level reveals how legally complicated the situation is.

Issues surrounding presidential immunity, freedom of speech, and the limits of defamation law make this case a constitutional heavyweight battle beyond personal disputes.

Trump has remained confident throughout the ordeal, reiterating that he has done nothing wrong and that he intends to continue the fight.

His supporters have rallied around him, viewing this as yet another example of America’s two tiered justice system being used to attack a political opponent rather than deliver equal justice under law.

Critics of the verdict have also pointed out that using massive financial penalties against political figures threatens the public’s right to open political discourse.

They warn that the precedent set here could have chilling effects on how elected leaders communicate with the American people.

As this legal battle heads toward the nation’s highest court, the implications stretch far beyond Trump himself.

This is a test of whether America still allows fair appeals and due process, or whether political pressure has permanently tilted the scales of justice in favor of one side.

Either way, this decision by the Second Circuit signals a pause in the rush to punish the president and a reminder that appeals are not mere formalities.

For Trump’s opponents, it is a frustrating delay.

For constitutional conservatives, it is proof that the rule of law, not mob politics, still has a chance to prevail.

Warning: Account balances and purchasing power no longer tell the same story. Know in 2 minutes if your retirement is working for you.