Hasan Piker certainly has created problems for Democrats, at least now that the primaries are all but over. But do they have a Hasan Piker Problem, per se, or do they have a problem that includes the “California Twitch streamer,” the preferred dismissive nomenclature for Democrats now?
That reaction from Democrats alone testifies to the problems that Piker has created for the general election, and not just in Michigan. However, the Wall Street Journal’s Damien Paletta landed closer to their real crisis in his assessment of the midterm risks Piker poses:
Piker has said controversial things that have been well-documented about Sept. 11 and American Jews, among other things. Many Democrats try to wave him away. But he’s not a nobody. He has campaigned with Abdul El-Sayed, a bit of a provocateur himself who also happens to be the Democrats’ candidate for Senate in Michigan. Piker was at El-Sayed’s primary election night party and even spoke to the cameras after El-Sayed won.
“Changes are coming,” he said.
Is this who the new Democratic Party is becoming? Some readers will tear their hair out with that question, but that’s what many voters are now asking. And it’s a question Republicans are hoping will continue to be asked.
Paletta then almost lands on the real danger Piker represents, along with the current crop of radical Democrat nominees in Michigan, Maine, New York, Florida, and Texas. He doesn’t miss it by much:
Which raises the question: What is November about?
There’s a new, energetic, extremely progressive crop of Democratic candidates on ballots across the country. While this has excited a number of Democratic primary voters, it has unnerved many others.
That actually is the problem. Midterm elections give the party out of power – or at least out of the White House, and this cycle Dems qualify as both – the opportunity to frame the cycle as a check on the president. Donald Trump should be particularly vulnerable on this point, given his usual low approval ratings and the intensity of Democrat derangement over Orange Man Bad. The war with Iran offered them another opportunity to ask voters to send a harsh message to Trump in this election.
Instead, Democrats made themselves, socialism, and Hamas the issues of the midterms. Hasan Piker helped drive that shift to the Left, but Piker was hardly alone in it either. The Squad in Congress had pushed for a radical response to October 7 in support of its terrorist perpetrators for nearly three years. Academia has indoctrinated multiple generations into socialist activism as well as anti-Western positioning. The mainstream media has pushed in this direction for years, normalizing radical rhetoric while characterizing dissent from it as Republican “pouncing.”
Democrats could have made this midterm all about Trump by simply choosing rational moderates and keeping the radicals at bay. Instead, they sold out to the radicals, socialists, and Islamists and made the midterms into a referendum on the Democrat Party. It’s an astounding example of incompetence at the highest levels of a major American political party.
This is what Chuck Todd missed in his response to Sarah Longwell and former Jill Biden aide Michael LaRosa. Todd opts for the “California Twitch streamer” trees while missing an entire forest:
Piker feels like a classic “online” vs “reality” story that has become familiar, meaning if you live mostly online, you know who he is. If you live a normie life (you know, go outside, touch grass, drive a car), you have no clue who this person is and when you are forced to read… https://t.co/u3HxlRqttN
— Chuck Todd (@chucktodd) September 1, 2026
… when you are forced to read about him, you simply chalk him up to another lost soul who thinks the online world is the real world. He seems like a totally overrated story[.]
First off, this doesn’t stand up to a reverse test, as David Harsanyi pointed out:
If a Republican invited Fuentes out to campaign, I suspect Todd and political media would cover it until every normie in the country was aware. https://t.co/tSwjYkFIOl
— David Harsanyi (@davidharsanyi) September 2, 2026
Precisely. However, even that truth is tangential to the actual problem. If Piker was just some Twitch streamer, Todd would be correct. However, Piker has been embraced by actual Democrat candidates in this cycle, operating as a surrogate for Abdul El-Sayed and praised by Ed Markey as the voice of the future for the party, among other notable endorsements (via Twitchy). Democrats are the people who have platformed Piker’s radical Marxism/Islamism and – until now, at least – actively sought his approval and support.
Why? Democrats are transforming into a radical socialist party with strong sympathy for Islamists and antipathy toward traditional and Western values. They are nominating candidates across the country that embrace these radical positions. That’s what makes Piker fit in so well in this cycle, which is much different than merely having a messaging problem with Piker. That transformation will end up being the center of these midterms, starting next week with the GOP’s midterm convention in Dallas.
That is the real problem Democrats have created for themselves in this cycle. And they have no one but themselves to blame for it.
Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy HotAir’s conservative reporting exposing the radical left and woke media? Support our work so we can keep bringing you the truth.
Join HotAir VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.
Read the full article here
