Tom Brady Says He Asked NFL About a Comeback, and the League Wasn’t Interested in a Player Owner Setup

Tom Brady has spent the past few years insisting he is done chasing Sundays, but he also admitted this week that he at least checked the rulebook on the way out the door.

In an interview excerpt published by CNBC, Brady said he explored the possibility of returning to the NFL and asked the league about whether an active player can also hold an ownership stake in a team. Brady said the response from the league was blunt.

“I actually have inquired, and they don’t like that idea very much,” Brady told CNBC. “So I’m going to leave it at that.”

Here’s What They’re Not Telling You About Your Retirement

Brady emphasized in the same interview that he is not planning a return. “We explored a lot of different things, and I’m very happily retired. Let me just say that, too,” he said.

The reason the question even exists is Brady’s business situation. He is a minority owner of the Las Vegas Raiders, and league rules create a hard barrier between “team employee” and “team owner.” Brady would have to divest his stake in the Raiders if he wanted to pursue a comeback as a player, and an NFL spokesperson told CNBC that there also “would be salary cap issues” if an active player owned a stake in a team.

Brady’s ownership group details were also outlined in the same reporting: he purchased a 5% share of the Raiders in 2024, alongside Knighthead Capital Management cofounder Tom Wagner (5%) and Raiders Hall of Famer Richard Seymour (0.5%). Brady told CNBC he has a “strategic advisory role” with the Raiders.

“I’m a minority owner,” Brady said. “So when you’re that, there’s really no job description. I don’t have really a daily role.”

This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year

The comeback chatter did not start from nothing, either. Brady’s comments came after he took part in the Fanatics Flag Football Classic in Los Angeles, an event that put him back on a field throwing to recognizable names and sparked the usual “what if” noise. Brady said the experience was fun, but he framed it as the opposite of a catalyst.

“I loved being out there playing in the flag game,” Brady said. “I loved not getting hit. I’ve got a lot of really fun things I’m involved in.”
“It’s never going to get old throwing passes to incredible athletes on the football field. But if anything, that game reconfirmed to me that I’m very happy in my retirement.”

Brady last played in the NFL in the 2022 season and is now positioned more as a public-facing football figure than an active one, splitting his time between his Raiders investment and his broadcasting work. He turns 49 in August, another reminder of why any comeback talk immediately runs into reality, even before the ownership issue enters the room.

Still, Brady acknowledging he asked the league about the rules is the part that will keep the topic alive. It confirms he didn’t just laugh off the idea in private. He checked. The league response, as he described it, was not a negotiation.

For now, Brady’s position is that he is retired and staying that way. The NFL’s position is that a player-owner arrangement is not something it wants to entertain, with league spokesperson comments pointing to cap complications in addition to the basic conflict-of-interest structure.

That leaves the takeaway simple: Brady may have been curious, but the rules, and the league’s appetite for bending them, are not.

Warning: Account balances and purchasing power no longer tell the same story. Know in 2 minutes if your retirement is working for you.

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of LifeZette. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.