Carl Higbie Goes Nuclear on Women Rallying Behind Lindsay Clancy [WATCH]

Carl Higbie sharply criticized supporters of Lindsay Clancy after a jury was dismissed without reaching a verdict, arguing that sympathy for Clancy has overshadowed the suffering of her husband and the deaths of their three children.

“So I’m about to say some stuff about Lindsay Clancy and this situation that’s going to make a bunch of people lose their mind, but it needs to be said,” Higbie said.

“And honestly, like, I’ll just bathe in your tears. I don’t care anymore. The jury was dismissed today without a verdict. Should have taken five minutes to decide, but here we are.”

Higbie took particular aim at women who gathered outside the courthouse in support of Clancy and criticized arguments involving hormones and postpartum mental health as part of her defense.

Gold. Upgraded. Buy real gold from $1. Store it in America. Sell it with one click.

“People often deny that hormones make women irrational, but now some women are using hormones as a legal defense for a woman who killed her children as they line up outside the courthouse to support her. Horrible,” Higbie said.

He argued that sympathy should instead be directed toward Clancy’s husband, who returned home and discovered what had happened to his family.

“I don’t see an ounce of support from those same women, no million-dollar-plus raised for the father who came home to find his children killed,” Higbie said.

“Some are even blaming him for this.”

This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year

Higbie then played a clip from Spencer Pratt, whom he credited with describing the phenomenon as “suicidal empathy.”

“This is something more sinister. What explains the outpouring of love for the mom who strangled her kids? Why are people trying so hard to exonerate her?” Pratt said.

Pratt broadened his criticism to what he described as a tendency among some progressive activists to direct sympathy toward people accused of serious wrongdoing.

“Is this what matriarchy looks like, or this kind of suicidal empathy that exploits the noble virtue of unconditional maternal compassion and perverts it towards the criminal dregs of society, all because wokeness now supersedes all normal virtue?” Pratt said.

“Yeah, 100%,” Higbie responded.

Higbie said Pratt’s video was banned on TikTok while other disturbing videos involving mothers remained available.

He described that disparity as an example of “Misguided, blind emotional allegiance over reason, over the lives of children, over society, over law and order.”

Higbie also discussed a 911 recording played for jurors, describing reports that members of the jury cried while listening to Clancy’s husband discover what had happened.

“This– this makes me sick. Where’s the sympathy for that father?” Higbie said.

“Instead, these crazy women are villainizing him: Oh, he didn’t do enough, or He wasn’t supportive enough. Are you kidding me?”

Higbie disputed claims surrounding Clancy’s mental health treatment, saying she had seen multiple doctors and challenging descriptions of her medication history.

“After eight-plus doctors, by the way, she was never diagnosed with postpartum or psychosis. She was not on 13 medications at one time as being perceived in the media,” Higbie said.

He argued that Clancy had financial and family support available to her and rejected the contention that feeling overwhelmed adequately explained what happened.

“She had a nanny, she had a family support network, her husband made between $300,000 and $400,000 a year, so they weren’t financially stressed,” Higbie said.

“In my opinion, she was a psychopath, fully aware of what she was doing.”

Higbie expanded his argument into a broader criticism of what he sees as declining respect for human life and a growing culture of victimhood. He connected the Clancy case to political disputes over abortion, mental health and personal responsibility.

“This is the problem with our society. People do the wildest stuff, and then they play victim,” Higbie said.

“There’s a race to victimhood in this country.”

Higbie also contrasted the attention surrounding Clancy with the struggles faced by military veterans dealing with the psychological consequences of combat.

“Look, I realize postpartum is a thing, okay? I’m a father of three, and guess what? I’ve been through it three times. It’s an emotional thing. I understand it,” Higbie said.

He then recounted traumatic experiences from his own military service and argued that severe psychological stress cannot excuse killing one’s children.

“Do I have PTSD? Yeah, probably. Giving chest compressions to my friend who just got blown up, his face falling off, holes all over his body, I’m hoping to keep his heartbeat long enough so we can get him on a helicopter and get him back to a medical facility to save his life so his kids don’t grow up without a dad,” Higbie said.

“Yeah, that adds some stress to your life, Lindsay. But I didn’t murder my kids.”

Higbie concluded by rejecting sympathy for Clancy and arguing that a male defendant accused of the same acts would receive a dramatically different public reaction.

“I bet that if this, if it was a man that did this on trial right now, that jury would have been back with a guilty verdict in 5 minutes, not 2 days,” Higbie said.