By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Concealed RepublicanConcealed Republican
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
Reading: Minnesota Court Gun Ban Extended
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Concealed RepublicanConcealed Republican
  • News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Guns
  • Politics
  • Videos
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Concealed Republican > Blog > News > Minnesota Court Gun Ban Extended
News

Minnesota Court Gun Ban Extended

Jim Taft
Last updated: September 3, 2026 1:34 am
By Jim Taft 4 Min Read
Share
Minnesota Court Gun Ban Extended
SHARE

When Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the Bruen decision, he explicitly said that some places truly were sensitive enough to warrant preventing guns from being taken inside. Courthouses were one of the exceptions he named, and while I disagree about the usefulness of such bans, the ruling is the ruling.





Of course, there are exceptions as to who can be armed in these places, but the point is that they are what they are.

And in places like Minnesota, they’re really starting to love their gun control, which makes this a little less than thrilling.

Firearms and other weapons will be prohibited in “court-occupied areas and other facilities used for official court business” throughout Minnesota beginning Sept. 1, the Judicial Branch announced Tuesday.

The order, signed by Chief Justice Natalie E. Hudson, expands a weapons prohibition that has been in place since 2003 at the Minnesota Judicial Center and in the Supreme Court Courtroom at the State Capitol, according to a news release. The expanded policy applies to court-occupied areas in county government buildings and other facilities used for the official business of the Minnesota Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, and district courts statewide.

The prohibition applies to everyone entering court-occupied areas, including individuals with a permit to carry a firearm, the release said.

There are what are termed “limited exceptions” for local, state, and federal law enforcement officers carrying out their duties in these places, but I think what bothers me the most about this is that it’s not just the courtroom, but anywhere the court does official business at the state level. That doesn’t just mean the courtrooms themselves, where criminals will be present and might, say, disarm someone, commit murder, then go on the run. Because that never happens to the armed guards, just regular armed citizens.





It seems the chief justice of the state supreme court has the authority to do this, which is a shame, because it’s dumb.

There will be screenings in place, which means it’s more likely to be effective than a sign on the door would be. However, if someone is determined to hurt someone, there’s not a lot you can do to prevent that. I’d think the legions of examples from places like schools would have shown that pretty well, but apparently not.

So, if you have business with state court today or any day going forward for the foreseeable future, leave your gun in the car. Because then it can be stolen and you can get blamed for that, too.

Seriously, it’s like these people never think. It’s why appeals to authority are so stupid when it’s outside of someone’s wheelhouse. If chief justices of state supreme courts can be idiots about stuff like this, anyone can be stupid about anything. Nothing is safer than it was on August 31st. Nothing will deter the truly evil from doing truly evil things.

But I’m very glad I don’t live in Minnesota, because it’s pretty clear where this court lands on the issue of gun rights. For the implication impaired, it’s not good in any way, shape, or form.


Editor’s Note: The radical Left will stop at nothing to enact their extreme gun control agenda and strip us of our Second Amendment rights.

Help us continue to report on and expose the Democrats’ gun-grabbing schemes. Join Bearing Arms VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.



Read the full article here

You Might Also Like

JD Vance reveals the heartbreaking conversation that convinced him to have a fourth child

Trump praises press and vows to reschedule Correspondents’ Dinner

TJPW: Yuki Arai retains Princess of Princess title, stops J-Rod’s historic bid

Trump drops divisive ‘Truth’ bomb about data centers, and even some MAGA voters won’t be happy

Democratic candidate says he would not want Biden or Harris to campaign for him

Share This Article
Facebook X Email Print
Previous Article HBO star declares USA is suffering without Kamala Harris: ‘Consequences of not trusting a black woman’ HBO star declares USA is suffering without Kamala Harris: ‘Consequences of not trusting a black woman’
Next Article Candace Owens’ Take on the Tyler Robinson Hearing Is Laughable Candace Owens’ Take on the Tyler Robinson Hearing Is Laughable
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

- Advertisement -
Ad image

Latest News

Maine high court rules father can restrict child’s attendance at mother’s church
Maine high court rules father can restrict child’s attendance at mother’s church
News
I Am a Retired US Army Special Forces NCO: There Is Nothing Like the Mossberg 590 Shotgun and the US Military Agrees
I Am a Retired US Army Special Forces NCO: There Is Nothing Like the Mossberg 590 Shotgun and the US Military Agrees
News
Candace Owens’ Take on the Tyler Robinson Hearing Is Laughable
Candace Owens’ Take on the Tyler Robinson Hearing Is Laughable
Politics
HBO star declares USA is suffering without Kamala Harris: ‘Consequences of not trusting a black woman’
HBO star declares USA is suffering without Kamala Harris: ‘Consequences of not trusting a black woman’
News
Delta flight returns suddenly to Minneapolis over reported pilot incapacitation
Delta flight returns suddenly to Minneapolis over reported pilot incapacitation
News
The US Navy Has Only 3 ‘Ready for Action’ Nuclear Aircraft Carriers Most of the Time and Its Completely Normal
The US Navy Has Only 3 ‘Ready for Action’ Nuclear Aircraft Carriers Most of the Time and Its Completely Normal
News
© 2025 Concealed Republican. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Press Release
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?