Legacy Media’s Climate Catastrophe Script Crumbles Under UN Panel’s Own Findings

The corporate media spent years insisting that nearly every storm, flood, drought, and wildfire represented proof of a worsening climate catastrophe.

Yet the leading United Nations climate panel offers a far more measured picture, one that clashes with the breathless narrative still being pushed by some newsrooms.

Media interest in climate coverage has declined since President Donald Trump returned to the White House.

The Washington Post, NPR, and other major organizations have reduced their climate operations as public interest in the familiar crisis script continues to fade.

Gold. Upgraded. Buy real gold from $1. Store it in America. Sell it with one click.

WATCH:

Climatologist Judith Curry announced earlier this year that she would stop maintaining her influential Climate Etc. blog.

Curry, who holds a doctorate in geophysical sciences, wrote that “Climate stupidity” had lost and that it was time for her to move forward.

This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year

The Associated Press appears determined to keep the alarm bells ringing anyway.

“Scientists have long warned that the world will experience more intense extreme weather events like heat waves, storms, floods and droughts,” wrote Peter Prengaman, the news service’s global climate and environmental news director.

“But what once seemed like the realm of fiction is now discussed as a possibility, even an inevitability.”

That dramatic declaration may sound frightening, but it does not accurately represent what the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports about many categories of severe weather.

The IPCC serves as the United Nations advisory organization for evaluating climate science and informing international policy makers.

Its reports are massive, technical, and difficult for ordinary citizens to digest, leaving media outlets with enormous power to shape public understanding.

That arrangement has produced predictable results.

A recent Data for Progress poll found that 61 percent of likely voters, including 72 percent of Democrats, believe extreme weather events increased during the previous five years.

The IPCC findings tell a more complicated story.

In the United States, heat waves have become more frequent and cold extremes have declined, but researchers detected no change in flooding, drought, winter storms, or hurricanes.

The global findings are similarly inconvenient for climate alarmists.

Heat waves have increased and cold extremes have declined, while no detected change was found for tropical cyclones, tornadoes, drought, flooding, or storms as a broader category.

Climate researcher Roger Pielke Jr. is working to make those findings easier for the public to examine.

His global extreme weather website tracks 57 variables across eight categories for every continent, using official information rather than media speculation.

Pielke also launched the United States Extreme Weather and Climate Change Dashboard, which follows 32 variables across seven categories.

Those categories include heat waves, tornadoes, flooding, drought, winter storms, wildfire, and hurricanes.

The researcher said his goal is to create a central location where citizens can review official measurements involving destructive weather.

His work has been cited by all three IPCC working groups, and Congress has repeatedly invited him to explain climate research.

The Trump administration removed the Environmental Protection Agency’s Climate Change Indicators website during a broader removal of climate related federal pages.

Pielke responded by building a more comprehensive resource, aided by artificial intelligence rather than a large staff and an expensive institutional operation.

The dashboards measure whether weather trends have changed, but they do not attempt to determine what caused those trends.

“Everything on the site is widely used, consensus science and consistent with the most recent IPCC,” Pielke said.

The sites also present American wildfire data, which show that the area burned has increased.

Pielke noted that worldwide wildfire records do not extend far enough into the past to support broad conclusions about global trends.

Public reaction has exceeded his expectations, while climate reporters have shown remarkably little curiosity.

“People like data, and they like the truth. So I have a ready audience,” Pielke said.

Pielke accepts that climate change creates risks and has supported efforts to reduce carbon emissions.

That has not stopped activists from labeling him a “climate denier” for challenging exaggerated claims about severe weather.

His project provides citizens with a way to compare scary headlines against actual scientific findings.

“I hope it can be used as a resource for people to get the facts, should they want them, and to hold others accountable when they misrepresent the evidence,” he said.

That accountability is precisely what the climate press has avoided.

When the United Nations panel itself reports no detected increase across several major weather categories, journalists should present those facts instead of recycling catastrophe copy that increasingly looks more political than scientific.

Gold is the oldest answer. SoundMoney makes owning it as easy as the apps you already use.