Hillary Clinton has found a startling new way to diagnose the Democratic Party’s sharp socialist turn, calling the development “healthy.”
Her assessment lands as democratic socialist candidates gain ground and establishment Democrats scramble to convince younger voters that bigger government is somehow fresh, daring, and new, as reported by The Gateway Pundit.
That framing is remarkable even by the standards of a party forever rebranding old leftist schemes as bold progress.
Gold. Upgraded. Buy real gold from $1. Store it in America. Sell it with one click.
Socialism has delivered scarcity, coercion, and economic ruin in country after country, yet Clinton now treats its return as an encouraging laboratory exercise.
The former Secretary of State made the comments Monday during a conversation with the Hamptons Institute.
The discussion covered diplomacy, national security, global leadership, and the ideological fight consuming Democrats as socialist challengers increasingly score primary victories against candidates supported by the party establishment.
When asked how Democrats can navigate the upheaval between the center left and democratic socialists, Clinton praised the party’s experimentation.
This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year
“The Democratic Party right now is, I think, going through a kind of experiment, like who can actually respond particularly to young people’s very real concerns about where they are at this point in their lives and what kind of future do they have for themselves? I think that is healthy,” said Clinton.
That answer may help Clinton stay current with the latest fashion on the left, but it does little to explain why socialism deserves another audition.
Calling an ideology healthy does not erase its record, nor does it make government control more appealing to families already squeezed by high costs.
Clinton’s positioning is especially notable because she defeated Sen. Bernie Sanders, the party’s most prominent democratic socialist, in the 2016 presidential primary.
Back then, she represented the institutional machine that resisted Sanders, even as his movement pushed Democrats farther toward sweeping federal power and expansive spending.
Now the party matriarch sounds eager to bless the same ideological surge that once threatened her path to the nomination.
That is familiar Clinton politics: get close enough to whatever Democrats currently celebrate, then present the maneuver as thoughtful leadership rather than transparent calculation.
The stated concern for young people also deserves scrutiny.
Younger Americans face legitimate worries about housing, wages, debt, and future opportunity, but answering those problems with more bureaucracy, heavier taxation, and centralized control is hardly an innovative cure.
Democrats increasingly seem convinced that the failure lies not in their policies, but in their sales pitch.
If voters hesitate, party leaders reach for softer language, attach the word democratic to socialism, and insist the same old concentration of government power is merely compassion with better branding.
Conservative critics quickly mocked Clinton’s remarks, and the reaction was predictable because her claim invites it.
Labeling socialism a healthy experiment sounds less like sober analysis and more like a refusal to learn from history, which is one reason critics invoked the definition of insanity.
The deeper problem for Democrats is that their internal struggle is no longer hidden behind carefully tested talking points.
Establishment figures and socialist insurgents may argue over tactics and timing, but both camps increasingly compete over how much authority Washington should wield over ordinary life.
That contest creates an awkward spectacle for Clinton, who has spent decades presenting herself as a practical guardian of the party.
She cannot dismiss the socialist faction without alienating energized activists, so she praises the upheaval as healthy and hopes nobody examines the diagnosis too closely.
There is nothing healthy about dodging the real consequences of failed ideas.
A political party can listen to frustrated young voters without pretending that socialism, wrapped in friendlier language and promoted by a new generation, has suddenly discovered a successful economic formula.
Clinton’s comments reveal how far the Democratic conversation has moved and how determined veteran figures are to move with it.
When socialism becomes the experiment, and skepticism becomes the obstacle, the party is not renewing itself; it is dusting off a discredited playbook and calling it progress.
Gold is the oldest answer. SoundMoney makes owning it as easy as the apps you already use.
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of LifeZette. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.
Read the full article here


